Skip to main content Accessibility help

Experimental Assessment of Strain Gradient Plasticity

  • Monica M. Barney (a1), Geoffrey H. Campbell (a1), James S. Stölken (a1), Adam J. Schwartz (a1), Jürgen M. Plitzko (a1), Wayne E. King (a1) and John W. Morris (a1) (a2)...


Classical plasticity theories generally assume that the stress at a point is a function of strain at that point only. However, when gradients in strain become significant, this localization assumption is no longer valid. These conventional models fail to display a ‘size effect’. This effect is seen experimentally when the scale of the phenomenon of interest is on the order of several microns. Under these conditions, strain gradients are of a significant magnitude as compared to the overall strain and must be considered for models to accurately capture observed phenomena.

The mechanics community has been actively involved in the development of strain gradient theories for many years. Recently, interest in this area has been rekindled and several new approaches have appeared in the literature. Two different approaches are currently being evaluated. One approach considers strain gradients as internal variables that do not introduce work conjugate higher order stresses. Another approach considers the strain gradients as internal degrees of freedom that requires work conjugate higher order stresses. Experiments are being performed to determine which approach models material behavior accurately with the least amount of complexity. A key difference between the two models considered here is the nature of the assumed boundary conditions at material interfaces. Therefore, we are investigating the deformation behavior of aluminum/sapphire interfaces loaded under simple shear. Samples are fabricated using ultra-high vacuum diffusion bonding. To determine the lattice rotations near the boundary, we are examining the samples with both electron backscatter diffraction methods (EBSD) in the scanning electron microscope and with a variety of diffraction techniques in the transmission electron microscope. The experimentally found boundary conditions shall be subsequently used to determine whether the simpler internal variable model is adequately descriptive or if the greater complexity associated with the internal degree of freedom approach is warranted.



Hide All
1. Fleck, N. A., Muller, G. M., Ashby, M. F., and Hutchinson, J. W., Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 475 (1993)
2. Stölken, J. S. and Evans, A. G., Acta. Mater. 46, 5109 (1998)
3. Stelmashenko, N. A., Walls, M. G., Brown, L. M., and Milman, Y. V., in Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of Materials Having Ultra-Fine Microstructures, edited by Nastasi, M., Parkin, D. M., and Gleiter, H.. (NATO ASI Series E 233, 1993) pp. 605610
4. Lloyd, D. J., Int. Mater. Rev. 39, 1 (1994)
5. Ashby, M. F., Philos. Mag. 21, 399 (1970)
6. Eringen, E. C., Microcontinuum field theories (Springer, New York, 1999)
7. Fleck, N. A. and Hutchinson, J. W., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41, 1825 (1993)
8. Acharya, A. and Bassani, J., in Micromechanics of Plasticity and Damage of Multiphase Materials, IUTAM Symposium, Paris. Aug. 29 - Sept 1, 1995
9. Wikström, A., Report 261, Department of Solid Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2000
10. Sun, S., Adams, B.L., Shet, C., Saigal, S., and King, W., Scripta Met. 39, 501 (1994)
11. King, W. E., Campbell, G.H., Coombs, A.W., Johnson, G.W., Kelly, B.E., Reitz, T.C., Stoner, S.L., Wien, W.L., and Wilson, D.M., in Joining and Adhesion of Advanced Inorganic Materials, edited by Carim, A. H., Schwartz, D. S. and Silberglitt, R. S. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 314, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) p. 61
12. King, W. E., Campbell, G. H., Haupt, D. L., Kinney, J. H., Riddle, R. A. and Wien, W. L., Scripta Metall. Mater. 33, 1941 (1995).
13. Hognestad, G., and Hills, D. A., Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 29, 79 (1994)
14. Adams, B. L., Wright, S. I., and Kunze, K., Met. Trans. A 24A, 819 (1993)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed