Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T14:10:41.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excimer Laser Photofragmentation of TMA on Aluminum: Identification of Photoproduct Desorption Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

T. E. Orlowski
Affiliation:
Xerox Webster Research Center, 800 Phillips Rd., Webster, NY 14580
D. A. Mantell
Affiliation:
Xerox Webster Research Center, 800 Phillips Rd., Webster, NY 14580
Get access

Abstract

New mechanistic details regarding aluminum deposition by ArF excimer laser photodecomposition of trimethylaluminum (TMA) adsorbed on aluminum covered SiO 2/Si substrates have been obtained using a time-of-flight quadrupole mass spectrometer. CH3 radicals and Al-(CH3)n (n = 1,2,3) species are efficiently photoejected from the surface with up to 0.22 eV of translational energy. Experiments at various TMA dosing levels reveal differences in desorbed fragment translational energy presumably associated with variations in surface site binding energy. No direct evidence is found for desorption of A1 from the surface indicating that A1 is more tightly bound than methyl-aluminum fragments. By carefully monitoring changes in fragment translational energy as an A1 deposit forms on the clean SiO2/Si substrate, we examine how the surface influences the onset of A1 growth. No evidence of ethane or methane desorption from the sample surface is found implying that radical recombination and hydrogen abstraction are primarily secondary gas phase reactions which are not surface initiated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ehrlich, D.J. and Tsao, J.Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1, 969 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Houle, F.A., Appl. Phys. A 41, 315 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Higashi, G.S., Blonder, G.E., and Fleming, C.G. in Photon, Beam and Plasma Stimulated Chemical Processes at Surfaces, edited by Donnelly, V.M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., 75, Pittsburg, PA 1987) p. 117.Google Scholar
4. Orlowski, T.E. and Mantell, D.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, in press.Google Scholar
5. Wedler, G. and Ruhmann, H., Surf. Sci., 121, 464 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Higashi, G.S., J. Chem. Phys. 88,422 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Ye, C., Suto, M., and Lee, L.C., J. Chem. Phys. 89, (2797) 1988.Google Scholar
8. Squire, D.W., Dulcey, C.S., and Lin, M.C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3 (1513) 1985.Google Scholar
9. Orlowski, T.E. and Mantell, D.A. in Laser and Particle Beam Chemical Processing for Microelectronics, edited by Ehrlich, D.J., Higashi, G.S. and Oprysko, M.M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., 101, Pittsburg, PA 1988) pp. 165170.Google Scholar
10. Ehrlich, D.J. and Osgood, R.M., Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 79, 381 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Lubben, D., Motooka, T., Greene, J.E., WendeIkTen, J.F., Sundgren, J.E., and Salaneck, W.R., in Laser and Particle Beam Chemical Processing for Microelectronics, edited by Ehrlich, D.J., Higashi, G.S. and Oprysko, M.M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., 101, Pittsburg, PA 1988) pp. 151157.Google Scholar
12. Orlowski, T.E. and Mantell, D.A., unpublished resultsGoogle Scholar
13. Avouris, Ph., Kawai, R., Lang, N.D., and Newns, D.M, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 2388 (1988), and references therein.Google Scholar