Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:21:06.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excess Vacancy Generation by Silicide Formation in Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. J. Jaccodine*
Affiliation:
Sherman Fairchild Center for Solid State Study, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA1 8015, rjj0@lehigh.edu
Get access

Abstract

It has been long recognized that excess point defects are generated when a metal silicide is formed on silicon. Since the common dopants diffuse in Si with the aid of both self-interstials and vacancies, these point defect perturbations will influence motion of diffusions that are in the adjacent vicinity. TiSi2 is known to enhance the concentration of vacancies and several mechanisms have been proposed for this effect. Recent literature has dealt with and rejected many of these ideas; however, some of the remaining few like film strain and lattice contraction upon silicidation have been the subject of state of the art experiments which has led to their rejection.

It is the contention of this paper that by using the experimental data from this recent work and reinterpreting it, the model of volume contraction of the silicides as the cause for vacancy injection, still represents the most physically satisfying cause and therefore, was mistakenly rejected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wittmer, M. and Seidel, T., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 5827(1978).Google Scholar
2. Wittmer, M. and Tu, K. N., Phys. Rev. B 29, 2010(1984).Google Scholar
3. Murarka, S. P., Silicides for VLSI Applications, Academic Press (1983).Google Scholar
4. Fahey, P. M., Griffin, P. and Plummer, J. D., Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 298(1989).Google Scholar
5. Wen, D. S., Smith, P. L., Osburn, C. M. and Rozgonyi, G., Appl. Phys. Lett, 51, 1182(1987).Google Scholar
6. Hu, S. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 308(1987).Google Scholar
7. Honeycutt, J. and Rozgonyi, G., Appl. Phys. Lett, 58, 1302(1991).Google Scholar
8. Italysantsev, A. and Kuznetsov, A., Appl. Surf. Sci. 73, 2103(1993).Google Scholar
9. Herner, S., Krishnamoorthy, V., and Jones, K., Appl. Surf. Sci. 103, 377(1996).Google Scholar
10. Herner, S., Jones, K., Grossmann, H., Poate, J., and Luftman, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1687(1996).Google Scholar
11. Herner, S., Jones, K., Grossmann, H., Tung, R., Poate, J., and Luftman, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2870(1996).Google Scholar
12. Herner, S., Jones, K., Grossmann, H., Tung, R., Poate, J., and Luftman, H., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 583(1997).Google Scholar
13. Herner, S., Jones, K., Grossmann, H., Tung, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2289(1998).Google Scholar