Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T06:45:15.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Rapid Prototyping Technologies for Use in the Production of Art and Artifact Study Copies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Jerry C. Podany*
Affiliation:
Department of Antiquities Conservation The J. Paul Getty Museum, Malibu, California.
Get access

Abstract

Many artifacts and works of art are too fragile to be accurately replicated for scholarly study by using traditional methods of plaster or silicone molding techniques. In addition to the potential for loss of surface and fracturing, the use of many modern silicone mold materials may lead to irreversible staining of the original surface.

An evaluation of newly developed rapid prototyping technologies and their potential application to this problem was conducted by the J. Paul Getty Museum Department of Antiquities Conservation in conjunction with Laser Design Inc. of Minnesota and Hughes Aircraft Corp. of California.

Rapid prototyping technology allows accurate copies to be made without surface contact with the original object. This paper discusses the outcome of an initial investigation into one of these processes, stereolithography. A plaster model was submitted for laser scanning using a point laser probe, programmed for a 3.175 mm (0.125) distance between scan lines. The input was filtered and stored in an STL (stereolithography) format which provides the X,Y and Z coordinates of the A,B,C and normal vectors of a predetermined number of surface triangles. This data was then used to produce a three-dimensional copy.

Stereolithography produces hollow or solid threedimensional forms by feeding data that make up cross sectional slices of the object scanned to a focused laser aimed along the Z axis of the potential copy. The laser polymerizes the outer contour of the 'slice' in a thin layer of photopolymer deposited on a stage located below the laser. Following each slice production the stage lowers approximately 19 mm (0.75) below the surface of the liquid polymer reservoir and upon resurfacing positions approx 0.05mm (0.002) lower than its previous position. A “squeegee” gently crosses over the surface resulting in a thin film of polymer available for the production of the next cross section. The laser is then sent the next cross sectional data and the sequence of section building continues.

The specific challenge presented by this project was to assure that the surface detail of the copy formed presented acceptable fidelity to the original object (model), avoiding any need for follow up bench work or correction. The advantages, drawbacks and newly developed alternatives to this promising technology are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Choi, Y., Weiss, L., Gursoz, L.E. and Prinz, F.B., “Rapid Prototyping from 3D Scanned Data through Automatic Surface and Solid Generation” in Issues in Design/Manufacture Integration, (Proceedings, The Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Texas, Nov. 25-30, 1990) A.S.M.E.,New York, N.Y., 1990. pp. 1723.Google Scholar
2. Hoffmann, Christoph M., Geometric and Solid Modeling: AnIntroduction, (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA., 1989)Google Scholar
3. Mankovich, N.J., Cheeseman, A.M. and Stoker, N.G., in Medical ImaQing IV: Image Capture and Display, (SPIE International Society for Optical Engineering Proc. Vol.1232, Washington,DC., Feb. 1990) pp. 183187.Google Scholar
4.Personal communique with Timothy Thelander of Hughes Aircraft (1992).Google Scholar
5.Anon, “Laser Based Methods Speed Up Modelmaking”, in Advanced Materials and Processes, V. 138, no. 1 (July 1990),pp. 5153.Google Scholar
6. Nutt, K., Photonics Spectra, 102104 (Sept. 1991).Google Scholar