Skip to main content Accessibility help

Engineered 2D Materials for Efficient Biosensors

  • Tharangattu Narayanan Narayanan (a1), Pulickel Madhavapanicker Ajayan (a1), Sowmya Viswanathan (a2), Gurusaran Manickam (a3) and Venkatesan Renugopalakrishnan (a3) (a4)...


The emergence of 2-dimensional (2D) materials could herald numerous advanced scientific methodologies for both fundamental and applied research. These ultrathin materials can be functionalized and, thus, have the potential to make new devices and sensors that are both highly efficient and sensitive. In addition to being mechanically robust, the 2D materials can be engineered to provide sensor architectures that further increase their inherent high surface area by creating 3D geometries using layer by layer assembly to make stacked devices that could potentially be transparent. The increased sensor surface area would deliver increased signal-to-noise and sensitivity. Here highly sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of bio-analytes using some of engineered 2D materials such as graphene nano-ribbons, fluorinated graphene, and molybdenum disulfide is presented. It is found that surface moieties, defects and surface charges in these ultra-thin layers result in enhanced electron transfer kinetics between the electrodes and biomolecules. This in turn results in an oxidation or reduction of biomolecules with a high peak current, indicating the possible uses of 2D materials for various point-of-care devices. A novel stable 3D electrode geometry has been found to have enhanced heterogeneous electron transfer properties compared to 2D electrodes and provides evidence that electrode geometry and surface area could significantly impact the performance of biosensors.


Corresponding author


Hide All

Present address: TIFR-Centre for Interdisciplinary Science (TCIS), Tat Institute of Fundamental Research, 21 Brundavan Colony, Hyderabad – 500075, India.



Hide All
1. Boopati, S., Narayanan, T. N., and Kumar, S. S., Nanoscale 6, 10140 (2014).
2. McCreery, R. L., Chem. Rev. 108, 2646 (2008).
3. Song, L., Liu, Z., Reddy, A. L. M., Narayanan, N. T., Tijerina, J. T.-, Peng, J., Gao, G., Lou, J., Vajtai, R., and Ajayan, P. M., Adv. Mater. 24, 4878 (2012).
4. Vineesh, T. V., Alwarappan, S., and Narayanan, T. N., Chem. Comm. (Under Review) (2014).
5. Mathkar, A., Narayanan, T. N., Alemany, L. B., Cox, P., Nguyen, P., Gao, G., Chang, P., Aburto, R. R., Mani, S. A., and Ajayan, P. M., Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 30, 266 (2013).
6. James, D. K. and Tour, J. M., Macromol. Chem. Phys. 213, 1033 (2012).
7. Narayanan, T. N., Vusa, C. S. R., and Alwarappan, S., Nanotechnology, 25, 335702 (2014).



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed