Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T08:49:39.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrostatic Measurement of Plasma Plume Characteristics in Pulse Laser Ablated Carbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. M. Mayo ,
J. W. Newman ,
A. Sharma ,
Y. Yamagata  and
J. Narayan
R. M. Mayo
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909
J. W. Newman
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909
A. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7907
Y. Yamagata
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7907 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7907
Get access

Abstract

A triple Langmuir probe measurement has been implemented to investigate plasma plume character in low fluence (∼ 3.0 J/cm2) pulsed laser evaporation (PLE) discharges and has been found to be an extremely valuable tool. Absolute plasma plume density estimates are found to reside in the range 1.0 × 1013–2.0 × 1014 cm−3 for vacuum pulses. A simple heavy particle streaming model for vacuum pulses allows estimates of the plume ionization fraction of ∼ 10%. This is consistent with typical deposition inventory suggesting that high kinetic energy ions play an important role in DLC film deposition. Electron temperature is found to consistently reside in the range 0.5-3.0 eV, and appears to be uninfluenced by operating conditions and large variations in Ar and N2 fill gas pressure. Consistent with strong plume ion and neutral particle coupling to the background fill, constancy of Te suggests expulsion of background gas by the energetic plume. The leading edge ion plume speed is measured via temporal displacement of spatially separated probe signals on consecutive PLE pulses. Flow speeds as high as 5.0 × 104 m/s are observed, corresponding to ∼ 156 eV in C+. The ion flow speed is found to be a strongly decreasing function of fill pressure from an average high of ∼ 126 eV in vacuum to ∼ 0.24 eV at 600 mTorr N2. Raman scattering spectroscopy indicates DLC film quality also degrades with fill pressure suggesting the importance of high ion kinetic energy in producing good quality films. Optical emission indicates an increase in C2 molecular light intensity with fill gas pressure implying a reduced, if any, role of these species in DLC production. Ion current signal anomalies in high pressure pulses indicate the formation of high mass carbon clusters during plume evolution in the presence of background gas. Mass diffusivity estimates, based on density decay, suggest the presence of under these conditions. Demonstration and control of such cluster formation may provide method(s) for controlling novel advanced materials properties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 593: Symposium U – Amorphous & Nanostructured Carbon , 1999 , 261
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Narayan, J. et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1845 (1987).Google Scholar
[2] Krishnaswamy, J. et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 245 (1989).Google Scholar
[3] Zheng, J. P. et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 280 (1989).Google Scholar
[4] Singh, R. K. and Narayan, J., Phys. Rev. B 41, 8843 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Lowndes, D. H. et al. , Science 273, 898 (1996).Google Scholar
[6] Norton, D. P. et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 68, 223 (1990).Google Scholar
[7] Singh, R. K. et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 68, 233 (1990).Google Scholar
[8] Lowndes, D. H. et al. , in Mat. Res. Soc. Syrup. Proc., Vol. 526, p. 325, Materials Research Society, 1998, Vol. 526.Google Scholar
[9] , Abhilasha and Thareja, R. K., Phys. Lett. A 184, 99 (1993).Google Scholar
[10] Dwivedi, R. K. and Thareja, R. K., Phys. Rev. B 51, 7160 (1995).Google Scholar
[11] Mayo, R. M. et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 86, 2865 (1999).Google Scholar
[12] Opower, H. and Press, W., Z. Nat. Forsch. 21a, 344 (1966).Google Scholar
[13] Yamagata, Y. et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 86, 4154 (1999).Google Scholar
[14] Chen, S. L. and Sekiguchi, T., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2363 (1965).Google Scholar
[15] Merkulov, V. I. et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2591 (1998).Google Scholar
[16] Geohegan, D. B., in Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films, edited by Chrisey, D. B. and Hubler, G. K. (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1994), chapter 5, p. 115.Google Scholar
[17] Segall, S. B. and Koopman, D. W., Phys. Plasmas 16, 1149 (1973).Google Scholar