Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:35:35.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Transmission Through Modified Schottky Barriers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Kevin L. Jensen*
Affiliation:
Code 6840, ESTD, Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375-5347, USA
Get access

Abstract

The effects of a Coulomb-like potential in the Schottky barrier existing between a material-diamond interface is analyzed. The inclusion is intended to mimic the effects of an ionized trap within the barrier, and therefore to account for charge injection into the conduction band of diamond via a Poole-Frenkel transport mechanism. The present treatment is to provide a qualitative account of the increase in current density near the inclusion, which can be substantial. The model is first reduced to an analytically tractable one-dimensional tunneling problem addressable by an Airy Function approach in order to investigate the nature of the effect. A more comprehensive numerical approach is then applied. Finally, statistical arguments are used to estimate emission site densities using the results of the aforementioned analysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Göhl, A., Günther, B., Habermann, T., et al. , J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B18, 1031 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Hill, R. M., Philos. Mag. 23, 59 (1971).Google Scholar
3 Forbes, R. G., “Low-Macroscopic-Field Electron Emission From Carbon Films …” (to appear in Solid State Electronics).Google Scholar
4 Jensen, K. L., Shaw, J. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 621, R3.3 (MRS., Warrenten, PA, 2001).Google Scholar
5 Jensen, Kevin L., “The Semiconductor Statistical Hyperbolic/Ellipsoidal Model For Evaluation Of Current From Microstructures,” (to appear in Symposium I1 proceedings of the Electrochemical Society Meeting (Phoenix, AZ, 2000)).Google Scholar
6 Filip, V., Nicolaescu, D., Okuyama, F., Plavitu, C. N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B18, 937 (2000).Google Scholar
7 Lerner, P., Miskovsky, N. M., Cutler, P. H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B16, 900 (1998).Google Scholar
8 Robertson, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B17, 659 (1999).Google Scholar
9 Jensen, K. L., Lau, Y. Y., McGregor, D. S., “Photon Assisted Field Emission…” (to appear in Solid State Electronics, 2001).Google Scholar
10 Hill, R. H., Philos. Mag. 23, 59 (1971)Google Scholar
11 Ridly, B. K., Quantum Processes in Semiconductors 2ed, (Oxford, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
12 Jensen, K. L., Shaw, J. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 621, R3.3 (MRS., Warrenten, PA, 2001).Google Scholar
13 Fowler, R. H., Nordheim, L., Proc. R. Soc. London A119 173 (1928). See Eq. (18).Google Scholar
14 In addition to Ref. 11, see: Forbes, R., “Theory and Modeling of Field-Induced Electron Emission,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 621, R3.1 (MRS, Warrendale PA, 2000); K. L. Jensen, A. Göhl, G. Müller, “Analysis of Measured I(V) Relations for Electron Emission from Insulating Diamond Films on Various Si Substrates,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 558, 603 (2000).Google Scholar