Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:53:31.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Transport and In-Situ X-Ray Studies of the Formation of TiSi2 Thin Films on Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

J. C. Hensel
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
J. M. Vandenberg
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
L. F. Mattheiss
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
F. C. Unterwald
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
A. Maury
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18103
Get access

Abstract

The formation of TiSi2 thin films on Si has been investigated by in situ x-ray diffraction and by electrical transport. The x-ray results show unequivocally that the staging proceeds through two orthorhombic polytypes of TiSi2 according to the sequence: sputter-deposited metallic Ti films on Si (001) → TiSi2 (C49 structure) → TiSi2 (C54 structure), with no evidence of lower suicides. Electrical transport shows metallic behavior for all phases and distinctive features in the annealing curves which correlate with the structural transformations. Most importantly, the resistivity, characteristically very high for the C49 phase, undergoes a precipitous drop at the C49 → C54 transition. Total energies for both phases are calculated and, consistent with the occurrence of a structural phase transformation, are found not to differ appreciably.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Beyers, R. and Sinclair, R., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 5240 (1985).Google Scholar
2. van Houtum, H. J. W. and Raaijmakers, I. J. J. M., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 54, 37 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Murarka, S. P. and Fraser, D. B., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 342 (1982);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, H. and Nakamura, Y., Thin Solid Films 34, 135 (1976).Google Scholar
4. See refs. [1] and [2] and also Malhotra, V., Martin, T. L., and Mahan, J. E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B2, 10 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Vandenberg, J. M., Temkin, H., Hamm, R. A., and DiGuiseppe, M. A., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 7385 (1982).Google Scholar
6. See, for example, Hensel, J. C., Tung, R. T., Poate, J. M., and Unterwald, F. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 4, 913 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mattheiss, L. F. and Testardi, L. R., Phys. Rev. B 20, 2196 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Mattheiss, L. F. (to be published).Google Scholar
9. Raaijmakers, I. J. J. M., Reader, A. H., and van Houtum, H. J. W. (to be published).Google Scholar