Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effects of Oxygen During Close-Spaced Sublimation of CdTe Solar Cells

  • D. H. Rose (a1), D. S. Albin (a1), R. J. Matson (a1), A. B. Swartzlander (a1), X. S. Li (a1), R. G. Dhere (a1), S. Asher (a1), F. S. Hasoon (a1) and P. Sheldon (a1)...

Abstract

The presence of oxygen during close-spaced sublimation (CSS) deposition of CdTe has been regarded as necessary for high-efficiency CdS/CdTe solar cells. To date, research has focused on the effect of oxygen on the acceptor density in the CdTe absorber. We find that although oxygen may influence the doping density, a perhaps more significant effect is its influence on nucleation and growth of the film. Oxygen partial pressures of 0 to 24 torr and total pressures of 5 to 45 torr (balance He) have been explored for CSS depositions. We find that increasing the O2 partial pressure increases the density of CdTe nucleation sites, thereby suppressing pinhole formation and likely reducing defects at the junction. However, increasing O2 also tends to decrease grain size and faceting in the films. In addition to influencing the film properties, O2 adversely affects the source material, producing non-uniformly oxidized surfaces that reduce deposition rates and impair device uniformity and run-to-run reproducibility.

We have also determined that the graphite susceptors typically used with CSS deposition convert a portion of the oxygen ambient to CO and CO2 during deposition. The amount converted is highly dependent on the type and age of the graphite susceptor used. The COx byproducts are not efficiently incorporated in the CdTe film and do not influence the deposition as oxygen does. We describe the effect of the changing oxygen partial pressure during the course of deposition. Finally, we report high-efficiency solar cells (12.8% AM 1.5) made without oxygen.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Tyan, Y.S. and Perez-Albueme, E. A., Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists' Conference, 794800 (1982).
2. Britt, J. and Ferekides, C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62 (22), 28512852 (1993).
3. Chu, T. and Chu, S., Final Letter Report to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, EAT-3-13159-01-104149, Oct. 1993.
4. Windheim, J., Renaud, I., and Cocivera, M., J. Appl. Phys., 67 (9), 41674172 (1990).
5. Birkmire, R. M., McCandless, B. E., and Shafarman, W. N., Solar Cells, 23, 115126 (1988).
6. Ikegami, S. and Nakano, A., Int. J. Solar Energy, 12, 5365 (1992).
7. Basol, B. M., Solar Cells, 23, 6988 (1988).
8. Jordan, J. F. and Albright, S. P., 23, 107113 (1988).
9. Basol, B. M., Int. J. Solar Energy, 12, 2535 (1992).
10. Hussain, O. M. and Reddy, P. J., Materials Letters, 10 (1–4), 165169 (1990).
11. Raychaudhuri, P., J. Appl. Phys, 62 (7), 30253028 (1987).
12. Tyan, Y. S., Vazan, F., and Barge, T. S., Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists' Conference, 840845 (1984).
13. Hsu, M., Jih, R., Lin, P., Ueng, H., Hsu, Y., and Hwang, H., J. Appl. Phys., 59, 6307–9 (1986).
14. Tyan, Y. S., Solar Cells, 23, 1929 (1988).
15. Tang, C. W. and Vazan, F., J. Appl. Phys., 55, 38863888 (1984).
16. McCandless, B., Birkmire, R., Phillips, J., Sixth E. C. P. V. Energy Conference, 826830 (1985).
17. Chu, T., Chu, S., Ferekides, C., Wu, C., Britt, J., and Wang, C., Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists' Conference, 952956 (1991).
18. Froment, M., Bernard, M. C., Cortes, R., Mokili, B., and Lincot, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 142, 26422649 (1995)
19. Albin, D., Rose, D., Swartzlander, A., Mountinho, H., Hasoon, F., Asher, S., Matson, R., and Sheldon, P., Material Research Society Symp. Proceedings, 410 (1995).
20. Rohatgi, A., Int. J. of Solar Energy, 12 (1–4), 3749 (1992).
21. Sudharsen, R. and Rohatgi, A., Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists' Conference, 504508 (1990).
22. Chu, T. and Chu, S., Int. J. of Solar Energy, 12 (1–4), 121132 (1992).
23. Ferekides, C. S., Dugan, K., Ceekala, V., Killian, J., Oman, D., Swaminathan, R., and Morel, D. L., Proceedings of the IEEE First World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 99102 (1994).
24. Al-Jassim, M. M., Hasoon, F. S., Jones, K. M., Keyes, B. M., Matson, R. J., and Moutinho, H. R., Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists' Conference, 459465 (1993).
25. Smith, D. L., Thin Film Deposition, McGraw Hill, New York, 1995, pp. 8384.
26. Birkmire, R. W., McCandless, B. E., and Hegedus, S. S., Int. J. Solar Energy, 12, 145154 (1992).
27. Dhere, R. G., Albin, D. S., Rose., D. H. Asher, S. and Sheldon, P., “Intermixing at the CdS/CdTe Interface and Its Effect on the Device Performance,” Proceedings for this symposium (1996).
28. Clemminck, I., Burgelman, M., and Casteleyn, M., and Depuydt, B., Int. J. Solar Energy, 12, 6778 (1992).

Effects of Oxygen During Close-Spaced Sublimation of CdTe Solar Cells

  • D. H. Rose (a1), D. S. Albin (a1), R. J. Matson (a1), A. B. Swartzlander (a1), X. S. Li (a1), R. G. Dhere (a1), S. Asher (a1), F. S. Hasoon (a1) and P. Sheldon (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed