Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T16:43:08.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Hydrogen or Nitrogen on Growth of Oxygen-Related Defects in Germanium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Noboru Makihara
Affiliation:
Matsue College of Technology, Nishi-ikuma, Matsue, 690, Japan
Kazuyoshi Ito
Affiliation:
Shimane University, Dept. of Physics, N ishi-kawatsu, Matsue, 690 Japan
Kaoru Mizuno
Affiliation:
Shimane University, Dept. of Physics, N ishi-kawatsu, Matsue, 690 Japan
Kotaro Ono
Affiliation:
Shimane University, Dept. of Physics, N ishi-kawatsu, Matsue, 690 Japan
Get access

Abstract

Oxygen-doped germanium crystals were used to demonstrate the interaction between implanted hydrogen or nitrogen atoms and the oxygen-related defects. The electron trap at Eo-0.26eV associated with the germanium A-center was found to be formed by electron irradiation. Another level at Eo-0.21eV also was observed on annealing at 120 °C. As for the sample implanted with hydrogen ions following electron irradiation, the trap concentration is four times as large as that for electron irradiation alone. It is probable that the germanium A-centers produced by electron irradiation capture hydrogen atoms and increase electrically active centers. After nitrogen implantation following electron irradiation, the Eo-0.26eV level almost annealed out at 140 °C and the trap at Eo-0.21eV wasn't observed. We propose that the reduction in the oxygen-related defect growth is due to the prevention of defect migration with nitrogen atoms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haller, E. E., Hubbard, G. S., and Hansen, W. L., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-24, 48 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Haller, E. E., Hubbard, G. S., Hansen, W. L., and Seeger, A., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 31, 309 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Haller, E. E.. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 46, 205 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Haller, E. E., in Radiation Physics of Semiconductors and Related Materials, 1979, Kekelidze, G. P. and Shakhovtsov, V. I. (Eds.) (Tbilisi State Univ. Press, Tbilisi, 1980).p. 233.Google Scholar
5. Haller, E. E., Li, P. P., Hubbard, G. S., and Hansen, W. L., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-26, 265 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Pearton, S. J., Kahn, J. M., Hansen, W. L., and Haller, E. E., J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1464 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Emtsev, V. V., Mashovets, T. V., Nazaryan, E. Kh., and Haller, E. E., Sov. Phys. Semicond. 16, 182 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Joos, B., Haller, E. E., and Faricov, L. M., Phys. Rev. B 22, 832 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Haller, E. E., Joos, B., and Faricov, L. M.. Phys. Rev. B 21, 4729 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Shi, T. S., Sahu, S. N., Corbett, J. W., and Snyder, L. C., Scientia Sinica 27, 18 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Pearton, S. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 59, 475 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Stein, H. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 59, 523 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Brower, K. L.. Phys. Rev. B26, 6040 (1982).Google Scholar
14. Deleo, G. G., Fowler, W. B., and Watkins, G. D.. Phys. Rev. B29, 3193 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Whan, R. E., Phys. Rev. 140, A690 (1965).Google Scholar
16. Fukuoka, N., Saito, H., and Kambe, Y.. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, L353 (1983).Google Scholar
17. Griffin, J. A., Hatung, J., and Weber, J., Materials Science Forum 38–41, 619 (1989).Google Scholar