Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:34:38.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Titanium Silicidation on Type II End-of-Range Dislocation Loops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S.B. Herner
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2066b
V. Krishnamoorthy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2066b
H.G. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2066b
K. S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2066b
Get access

Abstract

The shrinkage in type II end-of-range dislocation loops was used to determine the relative flux of vacancies from the silicidation of titanium on silicon (100) wafers. A low temperature anneal (700°C 20 min.) in a forming gas ambient formed the initial silicide (approximately 750 Å thick), and several higher temperature anneals with the silicide intact and etched off followed to study the diffusion of the vacancies. The concentration of vacancies captured by the loops after a 900°C 60 minute post silicidation anneal was approximately 7.8 x 1013 /cm2 while the concentration after a 700°C 60 minute post silicidation anneal was only 9 x 1012 /cm2. Removal of the silicide prior to the high temperature post silicidation anneals resulted in fewer vacancies captured by the loops.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Singh, R. N., in VLSI Electronics: Microstructure Series, edited by Einspruch, N. G., Cohen, S. S. and Gildenblat, G. S. (Academic, New York, 1987) p. p. 8492.Google Scholar
2 Honeycutt, J. W. and Rozgonyi, G. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1302(1991).Google Scholar
3 Jiang, H., Osburn, C. M., Xiao, Z.-G., McGuire, G. and Rozgonyi, G. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 211 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Probst, V., Schaber, H., Mitwalsky, A., Kabza, H., Hove, L. V. d. and Maex, K., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 708 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Fahey, P. and Wittmer, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc., Vol 163, p. 529 (1990).Google Scholar
6 Meng, H. L., Prussin, S., Law, M. E. and Jones, K. S., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 955 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Listebarger, J. K., Jones, K. S. and Slinkman, J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 4815 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Lur, W. and Chen, L. J., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3604 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Nicolet, M.-A. and Lau, S. S., “Formation and characterization of transition-metal silicides,” in VLSI Microelectronics, Microstructure Science, edited by Einspruch, N. G. (Academic Press, New York, 1983) p. 329464.Google Scholar
10 Wen, D.-S., Smith, P., Osburn, C. M. and Rozgonyi, G. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 466 (1989).Google Scholar