Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T08:24:07.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Si Addition on the Reaction Growth and Morphology of an Aluminide Compound in Al-Cu-Si/Ti-W Bilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M. Park
Affiliation:
Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering Dept., Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
S. J. Krause
Affiliation:
Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering Dept., Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
S. R. Wilson
Affiliation:
Advanced Custom Technologies, Motorola Semiconductor Products Sector, Mesa, AZ 85202
Get access

Abstract

The effect of the addition of Si to an Al alloy on the reaction morphology of Al12W in Al-Cu-Si/Ti-W bilayers was studied with plan-view and cross-section transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The addition of 0.5 wt.% Si to an Al-0.5Cu alloy film increases multiple spiked growths of the Al12W compound by the reaction of the Al-0.5Cu-0.5Si film with the Ti-W sublayer after heat treatment at 450°C for 30 min. Increasing the Cu and Si content from 0.5 to 1.5% significantly reduced the spiked growth of Al12W into the Al-1.5Cu-1.5Si film. However the spike number density remained high compared to the reaction of a binary Al-1.5Cu film with the Ti-W layers. The result indicates that the addition of Si to form a ternary Al-Cu-Si film results in a more irregular, less planar Al12W morphology. This morphology can have a detrimental effect on thermal stability and electromigration resistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hoffman, V., Solid State Technology, June 1983. 119.Google Scholar
2. Wilson, S.R., Mattox, R.J., and Seeger, J., SPIE, 945, 9 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Canali, C., Fantini, F., and Zanoni, E., Thin Solid Films, 97, 325 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chang, P.H., Liu, H.Y., Keenan, J.A., and Anthony, J.M., J. Appl. Phys., 62, 2485 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Olowolafe, J.O., Palmstrom, C.J., Colgan, E.G., and Mayer, J.W., J. Appl. Phys., 58, 3440 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Palmstrom, C.J., Mayer, J. W., Cunningham, B., Campbell, D.R., and Totta, P. A., J. Appl. Phys., 58, 3444 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Howard, K., White, J.F., and Ho, P.S., J. Appl. Phys., 49, 4083 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Wittmer, M., Legouse, F., and Huang, H.-C.W., J. Electrochem. Soc, 132, 1450 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Wittmer, M., Huang, H.-C.W., and Le, F. Gouse, Phil. Mag. A, 51, 687 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Park, M., Krause, S.J., and Wilson, S.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Proa, Vol. 260, 799 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Colgan, E.G. and Mayer, J.W., J. Mater. Res., 4, 815 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Ball, R.K. and Todd, A.G., Thin Solid Films, 149, 269 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Phillips, H.W.L., J. Inst. Metals, 82, 9 (19531954).Google Scholar
14. McLean, D., Grain Boundaries in Metals. (Oxford University Press, London, 1957), p. 116.Google Scholar