Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T21:57:03.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Processing on Oxidation of Ti5Si3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Andrew J. Thom
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Youngman Kim
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Mufit Akinc
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties and oxidation resistance of HIPed Ti5Si3 have been measured. HIPing submicron size powder compacts produces a crack-free, fine-grained microstructure with significantly higher hardness and toughness than a coarse-grained microstructure which contains microcracks within larger grains. Oxidation resistance is influenced by the grain size. Coarse-grained material has much lower mass gain than finegrained material in an oxidizing atmosphere and exhibits parabolic oxidation kinetics. The oxidation resistance of fine-grained material was measured between 700°C and 1000°C in air. Mass gain at 120 hours was measured to be 0.07 mg/cm2 at 700°C. At 900°C cracking of the scale leads to linear oxidation kinetics and significantly higher mass gain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shah, D.M., Berczik, D., Anton, D.L., and Hecht, R., Mater. Sci. Eng. A155, 45 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Anton, D.L. and Shah, D.M., US Air Force Rep., contract no. WRDC-TR-90-4122. OH, USA. (1991)Google Scholar
3. Smarsly, W., Rosenkranz, R., Frommeyer, G., Mater. Sci. Eng., A152, 288 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Frommeyer, G., Rosenkranz, R., and Ludecke, C., Z. Metallkde., 81, 307 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Liu, C. T., Lee, E.H., and Henson, T.J., Report, ORNL-6435; Order No. DE88007860, 1988.Google Scholar
6. Reuss, S. and Vehoff, H., Scripta Met., 24, 1021 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Kim, Y., Thom, A.J., and Akinc, M., in Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials for High Temperature Applications-II, edited by Srivatsan, T.S. and Lavi, V.A. (The Min., Met., and Mater. Soc. Proc. Chicago, IL, 1992) In Press.Google Scholar
8. Paine, R.M., Stonehouse, A.J., and Beaver, W.W., WADC Tech. Rep. 59-29-Part I (1960).Google Scholar
9. Thom, A.J. and Akinc, M., Iowa State Unversity, Hubbard, C.R. and Cavin, O.B., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Unpublished data.Google Scholar
10. Kuszyk, J. A. and Bradt, R.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 56, 420 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Kofstad, P., High-Temperature Oxidation of Metals, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1966, p. 13.Google Scholar