Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T20:48:21.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Oxygen Plasma Treatments on Polypropylene-Epoxy Interfacial Strength

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

E. Occhiello
Affiliation:
Istituto Guido Donegani S.p.A., Via G. Fauser 4, 28100 Novara, ITALY
M. Morra
Affiliation:
Istituto Guido Donegani S.p.A., Via G. Fauser 4, 28100 Novara, ITALY
G. Morini
Affiliation:
Istituto Guido Donegani S.p.A., Via G. Fauser 4, 28100 Novara, ITALY
F. Garbassi
Affiliation:
Istituto Guido Donegani S.p.A., Via G. Fauser 4, 28100 Novara, ITALY
Get access

Abstract

The effect of oxygen plasma treatment on adhesion and surface properties of polypropylene (PP) was assessed. An oxygen rich modified PP layer, immiscible with bulk PP, was formed by the treatment. Contact angle measurements showed that macromolecular motions led with time to rearrangements of the surface layer drastically decreasing its wettability, while its composition, measured by XPS, remained unaffected.

The shear strength of PP-epoxy joints increased after plasma treatment. The locus of failure was found to occur at the PP/epoxy interface for untreated PP, within PP in the case of oxygen-plasma-treated samples, close to the modified PP/bulk PP interface. This result suggests that the plasma treament improves the interaction at the PP/epoxy interface, but weakens the mechanical strength of the surface layer thereby creating a weak point at the modified PP/bulk PP interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Wu, S., “Polymer Interface and Adhesion”, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982 Google Scholar
2) Hudis, M., in “Techniques and Applications of Plasma Chemistry” (Hollahan, J. R. and Bell, A. T. Eds.), p.113, Wiley, New York, 1974 Google Scholar
3) Boenig, H. V., “Plasma Science and Technology”, Cornell University, Press, Ithaca, 1982 Google Scholar
4) Fowkes, F. M., J. Adhes. Sci. Tech., 1, 7 (1987)Google Scholar
5) Gutowski, W., Int. J. Adhes. and Adhesives, 7, 189 (1987)Google Scholar
6) Allen, K. W., “Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Adhesion Society”, Williamsburg, VA, USA, Feb. 22-27, 1987 Google Scholar
6) Yasuda, H., Sharma, H. K., T. J., and , Yasuda, J. Polym. Sci. Phys. Ed., 19, 1285 (1981)Google Scholar
7) Hsieh, Y., Chen, E. Y., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 24, 246 (1985)Google Scholar
8) “Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers”, Andrade, J. D., Ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1985 Google Scholar
9) “Polymer Surface Dynamics”, Andrade, J. D. Ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1988 Google Scholar
10) Morra, M., Occhiello, E., Garbassi, F., J. Coll. Interf. Sci., in pressGoogle Scholar
11) Garbassi, F., Occhiello, E., Polato, F., J. Mater. Sci., 22, 207 (1987)Google Scholar
12) Johnson, R. E., Dettre, R. H., J. Phys. Chem., 68, 1744 (1964)Google Scholar
13) Neumann, A. H., Good, R. J., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 38, 341 (1972)Google Scholar
14) Schwartz, L. W., Garoff, S., Langmuir, 1, 219 (1985)Google Scholar
15) Schonhorn, H., in “Polymer Surfaces”, Clark, D. T. and Feast, W. J. Eds., p. 225, Wiley, New York, 1978 Google Scholar