Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:07:29.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of End-of-Range Defects, Arsenic Clustering and Precipitation on Transient Enhanced Diffusion in As+ Implanted Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

V. Krishnamoorthy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
D. Venables
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
K. Moeller
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
K. S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
J. Jackson
Affiliation:
EATON Corp.
Get access

Abstract

(001) CZ silicon wafers were implanted with As at lOOkeV to a dose of 1×1015/cm2. The implant was amorphizing in nature and the peak As concentration was below the As clustering threshold. Subsequently, a second As+or Ge+ implant at 30keV at doses of 2×1015/cm2, 5×1015/cm2 and 1×1016/cm2 were performed, respectively, into the as-implanted samples. The samples with a double arsenic implant induce As clustering at the lower doses and As precipitation at the highest dose at the projected range. However, the samples with the Ge do not induce clustering or precipitation. The samples were annealed at 700°C for various times to regrow the amorphous layer and to cause enhanced arsenic diffusion beyond the end-of range region. These samples wereanalyzed by SIMS and TEM. The difference in the defect evolution at the end-of-range region and TED beyond the end-of-range region between the As and Ge implanted samples was used to isolate the effects of As clustering and precipitation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Nobili, D., Solmi, S., Parsini, A., Derdour, M., Armigliato, A. and Moro, L., Phys. Rev. B, 49 (4), 2477 (1994).Google Scholar
[2] Kim, Y., Massoud, H.Z. and Fair, R.B., J. of Electronic Materials, 18 (2), 143 (1989).Google Scholar
[3] Armigliato, A. and Parsini, A., J. Mater. Res., 6 (8), 1701 (1991).Google Scholar
[4] Armigliato, A., Parsini, A., Derdour, M., Lazzari, P., Moro, L., Nobili, D. and Solmi, S., Solid State Phenomena, 19 & 20, 393 (1991).Google Scholar
[5] Parsini, A., Nobili, D., Armigliato, A., Derdour, M., Moro, L. and Solmi, S., Appl. Phys. A, 54, 221 (1992).Google Scholar
[6] Said, J., Jaouen, H., Ghibaudo, G. and Stoemenos, I., Phys. Stat. Sol. A, 117, 99 (1990).Google Scholar
[7] Parsini, A., Bourret, A., Armigliato, A., Servidori, M., Solmi, S., Fabbri, R., Regnard, J. R. and Allain, J.L., J. Appl. Phys., 67 (5), 2320 (1990).Google Scholar
[8] Rousseau, P. M., Griffin, P. B. and Plummer, J. D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 65 (5), 578 (1994).Google Scholar
[9] Hsu, S. N. and Chen, L. J., Nuclear Instruments and Methods, B55, 620 (1991).Google Scholar
[10] Hsu, S. N. and Chen, L. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 55 (22), 2304 (1989).Google Scholar