Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:39:57.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Deposition Conditions on the Structural and Mechanical Properties of Poly SiGe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Sherif Sedky ,
Ann Witvrouw ,
Matty Caymax ,
Annelies Saerens  and
Paul Van Houtte
Sherif Sedky
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, B3001 Leuven (Belgium) Dep. of Engineering Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, 12211 Giza, (Egypt)
Ann Witvrouw
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, B3001 Leuven (Belgium)
Matty Caymax
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, B3001 Leuven (Belgium)
Annelies Saerens
Affiliation:
Dep. of Metallurgy andMaterials Engineering Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven (Belgium)
Paul Van Houtte
Affiliation:
Dep. of Metallurgy andMaterials Engineering Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven (Belgium)
Get access

Abstract

MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) are used in a wide variety of applications such as accelerometers [1], gyroscopes [2], infrared detectors [3],…etc. For high volume applications, fabrication costs can be possibly reduced by monolithic integration of MEMS with the driving electronics. The easiest approach for monolithic integration is post processing MEMS on top of the driving electronics, as this does not introduce any change into standard fabrication processes used for realizing the driving electronics. On the other hand, post processing imposes an upper limit on the fabrication temperature of MEMS in order to avoid any damage or degradation in the performance of the driving electronics. Polycrystalline silicon (Poly Si) has been widely used for MEMS applications [4], but the main disadvantage of this material is that it requires a high processing temperature (higher than 800°C [5]) to achieve the desired physical properties. In particular, a low tensile stress is needed for MEMS. Polycrystalline silicon germanium (Poly SiGe) seems to be an attractive alternative to poly Si as it has similar properties, while the presence of germanium reduces its melting point. Hence, the desired physical properties are expected to be realized at lower temperature. Depending on the germanium concentration and the deposition pressure, the transition temperature from amorphous to polycrystalline can be reduced to 450°C [6], or even lower, compared to 580°C for LPCVD poly Si. Also, the residual mechanical stress in poly SiGe is lower than that in poly Si [7].

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 609: Symposium A – Amorphous & Heterogeneous Silicon Thin Films – 2000 , 2000 , A8.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mizuno, J., Nottmeyer, K., Kobayashi, T., Minami, K. and Esashi, M., “Silicon bulk micromachined accelerometer with simultaneous linear and angular sensitivity”, International conference on solid state sensors and actuators, 2, 1197, (1997).Google Scholar
2. Geiger, W., Folkmer, B., Sobe, U., Sandmaier, H. and lang, W., “New designs of micromachined vibrating rate gyroscopes with decoupled oscillation modes”, International conference on solid state sensors and actuators, 2, 1129, (1997).Google Scholar
3. Sedky, S., Fiorini, P., Baert, K., Hermans, L. and Mertens, R., “Characterization and optimization of Infra Red Poly SiGe bolometers”, IEEE transactions on Electron Devices, 46 (4), 675–682 April (1999).Google Scholar
4. Eaton, W. P. and Smith, J. H., “A CMOS-compatible, surface-micromachined pressure sensor for aqueous ultrasonic application”, Proceeding of the SPIE, 2448, p. 258–65, (1995).Google Scholar
5. Singh, J., Chandra, S. and Chand, A., “Strain studies in LPCVD polysilicon for surface micromachined devices”, Sensors and Actuators A (physical), A77 (2), p. 133–8 (1999).Google Scholar
6. King, T. J., Pfiester, J. R., Shott, J. D., McVittie, J. P. and Saraswat, K., “A polycrystalline Si1-xGex gate CMOS technology”, IEDM technical digest, pp. 253–256, 1990.Google Scholar
7. Sedky, S., Fiorini, P., Caymax, M., Loreti, S., Baert, K., Hermans, L. and Mertens, R., “Structural and mechanical properties of polycrystalline silicon germanium for micromachining applications”, J. Micromech. Microeng, 7(4), 365–372 December (1998).Google Scholar
8. Kamins, T. and Meyer, D., “Kinetics of silicon-germanium deposition by atmospheric-pressure chemical vapor deposition”, Applied Physics letters, 59 (2), July, 1991, p. 178–180.Google Scholar
9. Cao, M., Wang, A. W. and Saraswat, K. C., “Low pressure chemical vapor deposition of Si1-xGex films”, in Process Physics and modeling in semiconductor technology, Srinivasan, G. R., Taniguichi, K. and Murthy, C. S., Editors, PV 93-6, p. 350–356. The Electrochemical society proceedings series, Pennington, NJ (1993).Google Scholar
10. King, T.J. and Saraswat, K., “Deposition and properties of low-pressure chemical-vapor deposited polycrystalline silicon-germanium films”, Journal of Electrochemical society, 141 (8), August 1994, p. 2235–40.Google Scholar
11. Caymax, M., Loo, R., Brijs, B., Vandervorst, W., Howard, D., Kimura, K. and Nakajima, K., “Comparative growth kinetics of SiGe in a commercial reduced pressure chemical vapour deposition EPI reactor and anomalies during growth of thin Si layers on SiGe”, Epitaxy and Applications of Si-Based Heterostructures. Symposium. Mater. Res. Soc, Warrendale, PA, USA; 1998; xi+377 pp. p.339–44.Google Scholar
12. Kamins, T., “Effect of silicon source gas on silicon-germanium chemical vapor deposition kinetics at atmospheric pressure”, Applied Physics letters, 61 (1), pp. 90–92, (1992).Google Scholar
13. Sedky, S., Witvrouw, A., Bender, H. and Baert, K., “Experimental determination of the maximum post process annealing temperature for standard CMOS wafers”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices (to be published).Google Scholar
14. Krulevitch, P., Nguyen, T., Johnson, G., Howe, R., Wenk, H. and Gronsky, R., “LPCVD polycrystalline silicon thin films: the evolution of structure, texture and stress”, Evolution of thin film and surface microstructure symposium. Mater. Res. Soc, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 1991; xv+731 p. 167–72.Google Scholar