Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T12:21:03.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamically-Stabilized Pores in Bilayer Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. D. Moroz  and
P. Nelson
J. D. Moroz
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
P. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

Zhelev and Needham have recently created large, quasi-stable pores in artificial lipid bilayer vesicles. Initially created by electroporation, the pores remain open for up to several seconds before quickly snapping shut. This result is surprising in light of the large line tension for holes in bilayer membranes and the rapid time scale for closure of large pores. We show how pores can be dynamically stabilized via a new feedback mechanism. We also explain quantitatively the observed sudden pore closure as a tangent bifurcation. Finally we show how Zhelev and Need-ham's experiment can be used to measure accurately the pore line tension, an important material parameter. For their SOPC/CHOL mixture we obtain a line tension of 3.0 × 10−6 dyn.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 463: Symposia EE – Statistical Mechanics in Physics and Biology , 1996 , 161
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Taupin, C., Dvolaitzky, M., and Sauterey, C., Biochem. 14, 4771 (1975).Google Scholar
2. Harbich, W. and Helfrich, W.,. Z. Naturforsch. 34a, 1063 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Chernomordik, L., Kozlov, M., Melikyan, G., Abidor, I., Markin, V., and Chizmadzhev, Y., Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 812, 643 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Leikin, S., Kozlov, M., Chernomordik, L., Markin, V., and Chizmadzhev, Y., J. Theor. Biol. 129, 411 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Zhelev, D. and Needham, D., Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 1147, 89 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Zhelev, D. and Needham, D., in Biological effects of electric and magnetic fields, edited by Carpenter, D. and Ayrapetyan, S. (Academic Press, 1994), pp. 105–142.Google Scholar
7. Evans, E. and Rawicz, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2094 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Chang, D., Chassy, B., Saunders, J., and Sowers, A., Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion (Academic Press, 1992).Google Scholar
9. Happel, J. and Brenner, H., Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics (Prentice-Hall, 1965).Google Scholar
10. Moroz, J.D. and Nelson, P., “Dynamically Stabilized Pores in Bilayer Membranes”, submitted to Biophys. J. (cond-mat/9610072).Google Scholar