Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:29:51.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DNA Binding To Conducting Polymer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Jeong-Ok Lim
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854.
Daniel S. Minehan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854.
M. Kamath
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854.
Kenneth A. Marx
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854.
Sukant K. Tripathy
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854.
Get access

Abstract

The polycation conducting polymers, oxidized polypyrrole and polyalkylthiophene, possess the ability to form complexes with polyanionic DNA molecules through largely electrostatic interactions. This study demonstrated the solution uptake and binding of 32p radiolabeled DNA by conducting polymer thick films (50–100μm). Polypyrrole (PPy) was synthesized by electrochemical methods and poly(3-hexylthiophene) (PHT) and poly(3-undecylthiophene) (PUT) were synthesized by chemical methods. The DNA binding rates on PPy films were affected by DNA concentration and the oxidation state (measured as conductivity). The DNA kinetics support a diffusion limited model for binding. We measured DNA binding levels onto all three polymer films; PUT, PHT, and PPy. The binding levels increased in the same order as the conductivities of the polymer films. DNA binding onto oxidized PPy film was diminished upon electrochemical reduction. These observations showed, therefore, the binding may be linked with the positive charge sites responsible for conduction in the polymer films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nalwa, H.S., Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 188, 105 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Elsenbaumer, R.L., Jen, K.Y., Miller, G.G. and Shacklette, L.W., Synthetic Metals, 18, 277 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Roncali, J., Yassar, A., and Gamier, F., Synthetic metals, 28, C275 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hotta, S., Synthetic metals, 22, 103(1987); 26, 267 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Diaz, A.F. and Lacroix, J.C., New J. Chem., 12, 171 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Malhortra, B.D., Kumar, N., and Chandra, S., Prog. Polym. Sci. 12, 17 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Frommer, J.E. and Chance, R.R., in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering vol.5, edited by Mark, H.F., Bikales, N.M., Overberger, C.G. and Mengies, G., (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 462507 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Zimmer, C. and Wahnert, U., Prog. Biophys. Molec. Bio1.,47., 31 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Minehan, D.S., Marx, K.A., and Tripathy, S.K., Proc. Amer. Chem. Soc. Div. Polymeric materials: Science & Eng. 64, 341 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Minehan, D.S., Ph.D thesis, University of Massachusetts at Lowell (1991).Google Scholar