Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T17:15:57.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dislocation Dynamics in Ni3Al: Experiments and Computations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. Bhate ,
S. Kumar ,
R. Phillips  and
R. J. Clifton
N. Bhate
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
S. Kumar
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
R. Phillips
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
R. J. Clifton
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
Get access

Abstract

A modified electrolytic etchant has been successfully used to observe dislocation etch-pits on {100} surfaces of single crystal Ni3AI containing Hf and B additions. Four-point bending tests have been used to obtain the dependence of dislocation velocity on resolved shear stress at room temperature. A comparison with earlier studies reveal that the rate of change of dislocation velocity with resolved shear stress, to a first approximation, is independent of alloying. Atomic level simulations have been performed using the embedded atom method (EAM) to study dislocation core structures and frictional stress in Ni3Al.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 552: Symposium KK – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys VIII , 1998 , KK10.10.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Veyssiere, P. and Saada, G., in Dislocations in Solids, Ed. F. R. N. Nabarro and M. S. Duesbery, 10, pp. 253–442 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Nadgorny, E. M. and lunin, Y. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 364, pp. 707–712 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Jiang, C. B., Patu, S., Lei, Q. Z. and Shi, C. X., Philos. Mag. Lett., 78, pp. 1–8 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kumar, P. and Clifton, R. J., J. Appl. Phys., 50, pp. 4747–4762 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Yamaguchi, M. and Umakoshi, Y., Progress in Materials Science, 34, pp. 1–148 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Tichy, G., Vitek, V. and Pope, D. P., Philos. Mag. A, 53, pp. 467–484 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Qin, W. E. and Chou, Y. T., Journal of Less Common Metals, 139, pp. 283–289, (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ezz, S. S. and Hirsch, P. B., Philos. Mag. A, 72, pp. 383–402 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bhate, N., Master's thesis, Brown University (1998).Google Scholar
10. Voter, A. F. and Chen, S. P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 82, pp. 175–180 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Vitek, V., Pope, D. P. and Bassani, J., in Dislocations in Solids, Ed. E R. N. Nabarro and M. S. Duesbery, 10, pp. 135–186 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Naguchi, O., Oya, Y. and Suzuki, T., Met. Trans. A, 12A, pp. 1647–1653 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar