Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:15:33.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusion Pathway of Interface Reactions in Amorphous-SiC/Ni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Z.F. Dong
Affiliation:
1509 University Ave., Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, W153705
J. H. Perepezko
Affiliation:
1509 University Ave., Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, W153705
A.S. Edelstein
Affiliation:
US Army Research Laboratory, Sensor Integration Branch, AMSRL-SE-SS, Adelphi, Maryland 20783-1197
Get access

Abstract

A multilayer sample of amorphous SiC (α-SiC) and polycrystalline Ni was prepared by ionbeam sputtering, and was used as a model, prototype system to study the stability of metal contacts with SiC against interdiffusion reactions near the interface. The modulation wavelength is around 80 nm and with equal thickness of α-SiC and Ni layers. By use of XRD, TEM and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), information on the structural evolution and composition distribution during heat treatment was obtained. The diffusion of Ni into the SiC layer, and Si and C into the Ni layer appears to take place concurrently during the annealing process. An amorphous reaction layer was formed during the heat treatment that is distinct from the α-SiC. The increase in thickness of the reaction layer followed a parabolic time dependence in the initial stage, until further reaction was limited by the precipitation of a graphite layer near the original α-SiC/Ni interface. A metastable intermediate phase and a NiSi phase were identified in the original Ni layer due to the diffusion of Si and C based on the decomposition of the α-SiC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Referneces:

1. Edgan, J.H., J. Mater. Res. 7, p. 235 (1992)Google Scholar
2. Morkoc, H., Strite, S., Gao, G.B., Lin, M.E., Sverdlov, B. and Bums, M., J. Appl. Phys. 76, p. 1363 (1994)Google Scholar
3. See, e.g., Comie, J.A., Suplinskas, R.J. and Hauze, A.W., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 1, p. 728 (1980)Google Scholar
4. Edelstein, A.S., Gillespie, D.J., Cheng, S.F., Perepezko, J.H. and Landry, K., J. Appl. Phys. 85, p. 2636 (1999)Google Scholar
5. Kim, C., Qadri, S.B., Twigg, M. and Edelstein, A.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, p. 3466 (1990)Google Scholar
6. Kim, C., Qadri, S.B., Lubitz, P., Schlesinger, T.E., Cammarata, R.C. and Edelstein, A.S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 126, p. 25 (1990)Google Scholar
7. Powder Diffraction File, PDF#:38-0844Google Scholar
8. Slijkerman, W.F.J., Fischer, A.E.M.J., Van der Veen, J.F., Ohdomari, I., Yoshida, S. and Misawa, S., J. Appl. Phys. 66, p. 666 (1989)Google Scholar
9. Klement, W., Can. J. Phys. 40, p. 1397 (1962)Google Scholar
10. Oya, Y. and Suzuki, T., Z. Metallkd. 74, p. 21 (1983)Google Scholar
11. Ruhl, R.C. and Cohen, M., Scr. Metall. 1, p. 74 (1967)Google Scholar
12. Dong, Z.F., Kim, S., Perepezko, J.H., and Edelstein, A.S., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
13. Fujimura, T. and Tanaka, S.-I., J. Mater. Sci. 34, p. 325 (1999)Google Scholar