Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-pt5lt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-18T10:39:10.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Methodology to Evaluate Microbially Influenced Degradation of Cement-Solidified Low-Level Radioactive Waste Formsa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Robert D. Rogers
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2203
M.A. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2203
R.H. Veeh
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2203
J.W. Mcconnell
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2203
Get access

Abstract

Because of its apparent structural integrity, cement has been widely used in the United States as a binder to solidify Class B and C low-level radioactive waste (LLW). However, the resulting cement preparations are susceptible to failure due to the actions of stress and environment. An environmentally mediated process that could affect cement stability is the action of naturally occurring microorganisms. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), recognizing this eventuality, stated that the effects of microbial action on waste form integrity must be addressed.

This paper provides present results from an ongoing program that addresses the effects of microbially influenced degradation (MID) on cement-solidified LLW. Data are provided on the development of an evaluation method using acid-producing bacteria. Results are from work with one type of these bacteria, the sulfur-oxidizing Thiobacillus. This work involved the use of a system in which laboratory- and vendor-manufactured, simulated waste forms were exposed on an intermittent basis to media containing thiobacilli. Testing demonstrated that MID has the potential to severely compromise the structural integrity of ion-exchange resin and evaporator-bottoms waste that is solidified with cement. In addition, it was found that a significant percentage of calcium and other elements were leached from the treated waste forms. Also, the surface pH of the treated specimens decreased to below 2. These conditions apparently contributed to the physical deterioration of simulated waste forms after 60 days of exposure to the thiobacilli.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Rogers, R.D., Hamilton, M.A., and McConnell, J.W., in The Possibility for Microbiatty Influenced Degradation of Cement-Solidified Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forms, edited by Interrante, C.G. and Pabalan, R.T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 294, Boston, MA, 1993) pp. 261266.Google Scholar
2 NRC, Technical Position on Waste Form, Rev. 1 (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 1991).Google Scholar
3 NRC, Proceedings of the Workshop on Cement Stabilization of Low-Level Radioactive Waste, NUREG/CR-0103 (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1989).Google Scholar
4 Rogers, R.D. and McConnell, J.W., Biodegradation Testing of TMI-2 EPICOR-II Waste Forms, NUREG/CR-5137 (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1988).Google Scholar
5 Rogers, R.D., Hamilton, M.A., and McConnell, J.W., Microbial-Influenced Cement Degradation - Literature Review, NUREG/CR-5987 (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1993).Google Scholar
6 Sand, W. and Bock, E., in Biogenic Sulfuric Acid Attack in Sewage Systems, edited by Houghton, D.R., Smith, R.N., and Eggins, H.O.W. (Seventh International Biodeterioration Symposium, Cambridge, England, 1988) pp. 113117.Google Scholar
7 Islander, R.L., Devinny, J.S., Mansfeld, R., Postyn, A., and Shih, H., J. Env. Eng. 26, 751 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Mori, T., Nonada, T., Tazake, K., Koga, M., Hikosaka, Y., and Hoda, S., Wat. Res. Res. 26, 29 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Kuenen, J.G. and Tuovinen, O.H., in The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on Habitats, Isolation, and Identification of Bacteria, Vol. 1, edited by Stolp, M.P., Tamer, H.G., Belows, A., and Schlegel, H.G. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
10 Alexander, M., Introduction to Soil Microbiology (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1977).Google Scholar
11 Rogers, R.D., Hamilton, M.A., Veeh, R.H., and McConnell, J.W. Jr., “Microbially Influenced Degradation of Cement-Solidified Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forms,” Stabilization and Solidification of Hazardous, Radioactive, and Mixed Wastes, ASTM STP 1240, edited by Gilliam, T.M. and Wiles, C.C. (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1994).Google Scholar