Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T16:43:06.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Degradation Studies Of Polypyrrole Coated Fibers For Microwave And Millimeterwave Obscurants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Leonard. J. Buckley  and
Mark Eashoo
Leonard. J. Buckley
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory Chemistry Division, Code 6125 Washington, DC 20375
Mark Eashoo
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory Chemistry Division, Code 6125 Washington, DC 20375
Get access

Abstract

Microwave and millimeterwave obscurants based on typical millimeterwave materials do not environmentally degrade with respect to their physical and electrical properties. The use of conductive polymer coated films and fibers with inherent environmental instabilities are being investigated as possible alternatives. Achieving the optimum electrical performance is highly dependent upon the polymer/dopant combination, deposition conditions, morphology, and volume of the coating that is used. Several conductive polymer coated fiber systems were investigated via thermal analysis. The effects of processing conditions on performance and stability were studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 413: Symposium W – Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Organic Solid State Materials III , 1995 , 553
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Jenkins, L., et al, Proceedings of the Smoke/Obscurants Symposium XV, Vol.1, 109 (1991).Google Scholar
2. See for example: a)Newman, P., Warren, L., Witucki, E., U.S. Patent No. 4,617,228, OCT 14, 1986; b)R.Gregory, W.Kimbrell, H.Kuhn, Synthetic Metals, 28, C823 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Gregory, R., Kimbrell, W., Kuhn, H., Journal of Coated Fabrics, Vol.20 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Samuelson, L., Druy, M., Macromolecules, 19, 824 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Munstedt, H., Polymer, 29, 296 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Wang, Y., Rubner, M., Buckley, L., Synthetic Metals, 41–43, 1103 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Park, D., Shim, Y., Park, S., Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 140, 2749 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Thieblemont, J., Planche, M., Petrescu, C., Bouvier, J., Bidan, G., Synthetic Metals, 59, 81 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Buckley, L. J., Eashoo, M.. Synthetic Metals, accepted for publication.Google Scholar
10. Neoh, K., Tan, T., Kang, E., Polymer, 29, 553 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Thieblemont, J., Brun, A., Monty, J., Planche, M., Polymer, 36, 1605 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Moss, B., Burford, R., Polymer International, 26, 225 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Davidson, R., Turner, T., Synthetic Metals, 72, 121 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Kaesche-Krischer, B., Heinrich, H., Chem. Ing. Tech., 32, 740, (1960).Google Scholar
15. Duncalf, B., Dunn, A., Soc. Chem. Ind. (London) Monograph No. 26, Gordon & Breach Publishers, New York, p. 162 (1967).Google Scholar