Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T23:33:34.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Degradation control of cellulose scaffold by Malaprade oxidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2014

Wichchulada Konkumnerd
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Japan Facalty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
Suong-Hyu Hyon
Affiliation:
Center for Fiber and Textile Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan
Kazuaki Matsumura
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Study on oxidizing cellulose scaffold to dialdehyde cellulose by sodium periodate (NaIO4) was carried out. Concentration of sodium periodate and the reaction time were effected for aldehyde introduction to cellulose scaffolds. Cellulose powder was dissolved in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, an ionic liquid, at 100°C and maintained at room temperature for 7 days, providing flexible cellulose scaffold. The cellulose scaffold was oxidized using periodate oxidation (Malaprade oxidation), which oxidizes carbohydrate by glycol cleavage to provide dialdehyde. Aldehyde groups introduced into cellulose were quantified by simple iodometry. Oxidized cellulose scaffold was degraded in the amino acid solution triggered by the reaction between aldehyde groups and amino groups. During immersion of the cellulose scaffolds in the amino acid solution, the mass loss of the scaffolds was evaluated by measuring of weight of oxidized cellulose scaffold before and after degradation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ko, H., Sfeir, C., and Kumta, P.N., The Royal Society 368, 19811997( 2010).Google Scholar
Elcin, A., Cell Blood Sub 34, 407418 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, S., Feng, Y., Liang, Z., Fu, Q., and Zhang, E., Transactions of Tianjin University 11, 250254 (2004).Google Scholar
RoyChowdhury, P., and Kumar, V., J Biomed Mater Res A 76, 300309 (2005).Google Scholar
Singh, M., Ray, A., and Vasudevan, P., Biomaterials 3, 1620 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsioptsias, C., and Panayiotou, C., Carbohyd Polym 74, 99105 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martina, B., Katerina, K., Miloslava, R., Jan, D., and Ruta, M, Adv Polym Tech 28. 199208 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar