Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:08:05.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defects In Low Temperature Mbe-Grown Si And Sige/Si Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

W. M. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN, wmc@ifm.liu.se
I. A. Buyanova
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN, wmc@ifm.liu.se
B. Monemar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Measurement Technology, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN, wmc@ifm.liu.se
Get access

Abstract

We review our recent experimental results on important grown-in non-radiative defects in Si and SiGe/Si heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) at low temperature. Several types of such defects have been revealed by the optically detected magnetic resonance technique and were shown to play an important role in carrier recombination. Among them a dominant defect is identified to be the vacancy-oxygen (V-O) complex. Experimental evidence on the formation mechanisms of these non-radiative defects points at a low surface adatom mobility during low temperature growth as a major cause, and also ion bombardment as occurs e.g. during potential enhanced doping. Based on the gained knowledge, educated attempts by post-growth hydrogen and thermal treatments have been made to remove these harmful defects and to improve the radiative efficiency of the material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wong, K.B., Jaros, M., Morrison, I. and Hagon, J.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2221 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Lu, Z.H., Lockwood, D.J. and Baribeau, J.-M., Nature 378, 258 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Michel, J., Ren, F.Y.G., Zheng, B., Jacobson, D.C., Poate, J.M. and Kimerling, L.C., Mat. Sci. Forum 143, 707 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Chen, W.M. and Monemar, B., Appl. Phys. A 53, 130135 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Chen, W.M., Awadelkarim, O.O., Monemar, B., Lindström, J.L. and Oehrlein, G.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3042 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Chen, W.M., Monemar, B., Janzén, E. and Lindström, J. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1914 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Buyanova, I.A., Chen, W.M., Henry, A., Ni, W.-X., Hansson, G.V. and Monemar, B., Phys. Rev. B 52, 12006 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Chen, W.M., Buyanova, I.A., Henry, A., Ni, W.-X., Hansson, G.V. and Monemar, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1256 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Buyanova, I.A., Chen, W.M., Henry, A., Ni, W.-X., Hansson, G.V. and Monemar, B., Phys. Rev. B 53, 9587 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Watkins, G.D. and Corbett, J.W., Phys. Rev. 121, 1001 (1961).Google Scholar
11. Watkins, G.D., Corbett, J.W. and Walker, R.M., J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1198 (1959).Google Scholar
12. Chen, W.M., Buyanova, I.A., Ni, W.-X., Hansson, G.V. and Monemar, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4214 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Feher, G., Phys. Rev. 114, 1219 (1959); A. Stesmans and G. De Vos, Phys. Rev. B34, 6499 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Frens, A.M., Bennebroek, M.T., Zakrzewski, A., Schmidt, J., Chen, W.M., Janzén, E., Lindström, J. L. and Monemar, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2939 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Schockley, W. and Read, W.T., Phys. Rev. 87, 835 (1952);R.N. Hall, Phys. Rev. 87, 387 (1952).Google Scholar
16. Ni, W.-X., Radnoczi, G., and Hansson, G.V., Thin Solid Films 184, 403 (1990).Google Scholar
17. Chen, W.M., Buyanova, I.A., Ni, W.-X., Hansson, G.V. and Monemar, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. Jan. 11 (1997) in press.Google Scholar
18. Chen, W.M., Buyanova, I.A., Pozina, G., Monemar, B., Ni, W.-X. and Hansson, G. V., unpublished results.Google Scholar