Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T11:02:05.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defect-Minimized SiGe Layer Using Ion Beam Synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Seongil Im
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Jack Washbum
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Ronald Gronsky
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Nathan W. Cheung
Affiliation:
Electronics Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Kin Man Yu
Affiliation:
Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

Ion Beam Synthesis for SiGe layers was performed to study the end-of-range(EOR) defects and strain-induced dislocations. High Ge doses of 5×1016/cm2, 3×1016/cm2 and 2×1016/cm2 at 120 keV were implanted to obtain 12 at%, 7 at% and 5 at% of Ge peak concentrations respectively. RBS spectra show a projected range(Rp) at a depth of 65nm and an amorphous thickness of 170nm on a wafer with 12 at% of Ge peak concentration. Ge ion implantation was performed both at room temperature(RT) and at liquid nitrogen temperature(LNT), in order to investigate the effect of implantation temperature on reducing EOR defect density. Solid phase epitaxial(SPE) annealing for all SiGe layers was done in nitrogen ambient at 800°C. The EOR defect density is considerably reduced by LNT implantation and the strain-induced dislocations have a threshold Ge peak concentration(about 6 at%) for their abrupt generation. For SiGe layer with 12 at% Ge peak concentration, the amorphous-crystalline(a/c) interfacial morphology changes from a planar interface into a faceted interface during SPE growth at 550°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Z-Matutinovic-Krstelj, , Prinz, E. J., Schwartz, P. V., Sturm, J.C., IEEE Electronic Device Lett., 12(4), 163 (1991)Google Scholar
2. Patton, G. L., Iyer, S. S., Delage, S. L., Tiwari, S., Stork, J. M. C., IEEE Electronic Device Lett., 9(4), 165 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Patton, G. L., Comfort, J. H., Meyerson, B. S., Crabbe, E. F., Scilla, G. J., De Fresan, E., Stork, J. C., Sun, J.Y.-C., IEEE Electronic Device Lett., 11(4), 171 (1990)Google Scholar
4. Fukami, Akira, Shoji, Ken-ichi, Nagano, Takahiro, Yang, Cary Y., Appl Phys. Lett. 5 (22), 2345 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fukami, Akira, Shoji, Ken-ichi, Nagano, Takahiro, Yang, Cary Y., Microelectronic Engineering 15, 15 (1991)Google Scholar
6. Prussin, S., Jones, K. S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, (6), 1912 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jones, K. S., Venables, D., J. Appl Phys. 69(5), 2931 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ganin, E. and Marwick, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 147, 13 (1989)Google Scholar
9. Paine, D.C., Howard, D.J., Stoffel, N.G., J. Electronic Materials, 20, (10), 735 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Paine, D.C., Howard, D.J., Horton, J.A., J. Mater. Res., 5, 1023(1990)Google Scholar
11. Williams, J.S., Ridgway, M.C., Elliman, R.G., Davies, J.A., Johnson, S.T., Palmer, G.R., Nucl. Inst. Meth. in Phys. Res. B (55), 602 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Mazzone, A.M., Phys. Stat. Sol., 95, (a), 149 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Paine, D.C., Howard, D.J., Stoffel, N.G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 187, 279(1990)Google Scholar
14. Drosd, R., Washburn, J., J. Appl Phys., 53(1), 397 (1982)Google Scholar
15. Csepregi, L., Mayer, J., Sigmon, T., Appl Phys. Lett., 29, 92(1976)Google Scholar