Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T12:04:50.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contamination Monitoring Using Surface Photovoltage and Application to Process Line Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Lubek Jastrzebski
Affiliation:
Center for Microelectronics Research at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
Jacek Lagowski
Affiliation:
Center for Microelectronics Research at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
Worth Henley
Affiliation:
Center for Microelectronics Research at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
Piotr Edelman
Affiliation:
and “Semiconductor Diagnostics, Inc., Tampa, FL 33610.
Get access

Abstract

Surface photovoltage (SPV) measurements of lifetime and charge are used by the silicon industry for real-time, non-contact monitoring of alkalide and heavy metal contamination during IC processing. Information about contamination present at the surface or in the bulk of a silicon wafer is derived from their effects on measured electronic characterization. Identification and detection, with a sensitivity of ppq (107 cm'3), of Fe and Cr in the bulk of p-type silicon is possible via monitoring of their decomposition/pairing kinetics with boron. We will show the most important examples of the application of SPV to monitor critical IC processing steps. The allowable contamination thresholds in IC processing lines are a very strong function of technology and are different for various metals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Henley, W.B., et al. , Proc. 1993 IEEE Rel. Phys. Symp., Atlanta, GA, p. 22.Google Scholar
2 Henley, W.B., et al. , Proc. Mat. Res. Soc, San Francisco, CA, April 1992, Vol. 262, p. 993.Google Scholar
3 Huber, D., Proceed, of the Nat. Renewable Energy Lab 1992 Workshop, Breckenridge, CO, August 1992.Google Scholar
4 Oshawa, A., et al. , “Semicond. Silicon 1990,” Proceed. 6th Int. Symp. Si Mat. Science and Technology, p. 601, H. Huff, Electrochem. Soc. Proceed. Vol. 90-7 and Nikkei Microdevices (in Japanese), p. 54, May 1990.Google Scholar
5 Jastrzebski, L., et al. , “3rd Int. Symp. on Cleaning Technology,” Electrochem. Soc. Meet., October 1993, New Orleans, LA, in press.Google Scholar
6 Jastrzebski, L., et al. , Solid State Tech, 35, 27, December 1992.Google Scholar
7 Lagowski, J., et al. , Semicond. Science Tech. 7 A185 (1992).Google Scholar
8 Lagowski, J., et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett., 63(21), 2902 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Jastrzebski, L., et al. , J. Electrochem. Soc, 140(4), 1152 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Lagowski, J., et. al. “Defect Recognition Image Processing 5” Conf., September 1993, Spain, in press.Google Scholar
11 Zoth, G., et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 67, 6764 (1990).Google Scholar
12 Lagowski, J., et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett., 63(22), 3043 (1993).Google Scholar
13 Mishra, K., et al. , presented at Electrochem. Soc. Meet., Toronto, Ontario, October 1993.Google Scholar
14 Lagowski, J., unpublished.Google Scholar
15 Matsumoto, K., Katoh, H., Kohno, M., Jap. Appl. Phys. Soc. Meet., March 1994.Google Scholar
16 Semiconductor Diagnostics, Inc.'s specification for Optical Fe Activation Station option of SPV Tools.Google Scholar
17 Fujino, N., et al. , “Semicond. Silicon 1990,” Proceed. 6th Int. Symp. Si Mat. Science and Technology, p. 709, H. Huff, Electrochem. Soc. Proceed. Vol. 90–7.Google Scholar
18 Jastrzebski, L., Henley, W., Milic, O., Lagowski, J., Lowell, J., DeBusk, D., Persson, E., and Nauka, K., 1994 IES Proceed. Vol. 1, p. 316 (1994).Google Scholar