Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:51:02.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constrained Grain Boundary Diffusion In Thin Copper Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Markus J. Buehler ,
Alexander Hartmaier  and
Huajian Gao
Markus J. Buehler
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Alexander Hartmaier
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Huajian Gao
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

In a recent study of diffusional creep in polycrystalline thin films deposited on substrates, we have discovered a new class of defects called the grain boundary diffusion wedges (Gao et al., Acta Mat. 47, pp. 2865-2878, 1999). These diffusion wedges are formed by stress driven mass transport between the free surface of the film and the grain boundaries during the process of substrate-constrained grain boundary diffusion. The mathematical modeling involves solution of integro-differential equations representing a strong coupling between elasticity and diffusion. The solution can be decomposed into diffusional eigenmodes reminiscent of crack-like opening displacement along the grain boundary which leads to a singular stress field at the root of the grain boundary. We find that the theoretical analysis successfully explains the difference between the mechanical behaviors of passivated and unpassivated copper films during thermal cycling on a silicon substrate. An important implication of our theoretical analysis is that dislocations with Burgers vector parallel to the interface can be nucleated at the root of the grain boundary. This is a new dislocation mechanism in thin films which contrasts to the well known Mathews-Freund-Nix mechanism of threading dislocation propagation. Recent TEM experiments at the Max Planck Institute for Metals Research have shown that, while threading dislocations dominate in passivated metal films, parallel glide dislocations begin to dominate in unpassivated copper films with thickness below 400 nm. This is consistent with our theoretical predictions. We have developed large scale molecular dynamics simulations of grain boundary diffusion wedges to clarify the nucleation mechanisms of parallel glide in thin films. Such atomic scale simulations of thin film diffusion not only show results which are consistent with both continuum theoretical and experimental studies, but also revealed the atomic processes of dislocation nucleation, climb, glide and storage in grain boundaries. The study should have far reaching implications for modeling deformation and diffusion in micro- and nanostructured materials.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 821: Symposium P – Nanoscale Materials & Modeling-Relations Among Processing, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties , 2004 , P1.2
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Vinci, R., Zielinski, E., Bravman, J., Thin Solid Films 262, 142–153 (1995)Google Scholar
2. Kobrinsky, M.J., Thompson, C.V., Appl. Phys. Letts. 73, 2429–2431 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Keller, R.-M., Baker, S. P., Arzt, E., Acta Mat. 47, 415–426 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Freund, L.B., J. Appl. Mech. 54, 553–557 (1987)Google Scholar
5. Nix, W., Metall. Trans. A. 20, 2217–2245 (1989)Google Scholar
6. Nix, W., Scripta Mater. 39, 545–554 (1998)Google Scholar
7. Blanckenhagen, B. von, Gumbsch, P., Arzt, E., Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 9, 157–169 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Balk, T. J., Dehm, G., Arzt, E., Z. Metallk. 93 (5), 383–391 (2002)Google Scholar
9. Legros, M., Hemker, K.J., Gouldstone, A., Suresh, S., Keller-Flaig, R.-M., Arzt, E., Acta Mat. 50, 3435–3452 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Balk, T.J., Dehm, G., Arzt, E., Acta Mat. 51, 4471–4485 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Blanckenhagen, B. von, Gumbsch, P., Arzt, E., Phil. Mag. Lett. 83, 1–8 (2003).Google Scholar
12. Balk, T.J., Dehm, G., Arzt, E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 673, 2.7.1–2.7.6 (2001).Google Scholar
13. Gao, H., Zhang, L., Nix, W., Thompson, C., Arzt, E., Acta Mater. 47, 2865–2878 (1999)Google Scholar
14. Weiss, D., Gao, H., Arzt, E., Acta Mater. 49, 2395–2403 (2001)Google Scholar
15. Zhang, L. and Gao, H., Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde 93 (5), 417–427 (2002)Google Scholar
16. Buehler, M.J., Hartmaier, A., Gao, H., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51, 2105–2125 (2003).Google Scholar
17. Buehler, M.J., Hartmaier, A., Gao, H., Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., in the press (2004).Google Scholar
18. Hartmaier, A., Buehler, M.J., Gao, H., Defect and Diffusion Forum 224–225, 107–128 (2003).Google Scholar
19. Buehler, M.J., Balk, T.J., Arzt, E., Gao, H., in: Handbook of Computational and Theoretical Nanotechnology (to appear).Google Scholar
20. Shen, Y.L., J. Mater. Res. 18, 2281–2284 (2003)Google Scholar
21. Buehler, M.J., Hartmaier, A., Gao, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 779, 103–108 (April 2003).Google Scholar
22. Buehler, M.J., Gao, H., in: Handbook of Computational and Theoretical Nanotechnology (to appear).Google Scholar
23. Buehler, M.J., Abraham, F.F., Gao, H., Nature 426, 141–146 (2003).Google Scholar
24. Stadler, J., Mikulla, R., Trebin, H.-R., Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 8, 1131–1140 (1997).Google Scholar
25. Mishin, Y., Mehl, M.J., Papaconstantopoulos, D.A., Voter, A.F., Kress, J.D., Phys. Rev. B 63, 224106 (2001).Google Scholar
26. Yamakov, V., Wolf, D., Phillpot, W., Gleiter, H., Acta Mater. 50, 61–73 (2002)Google Scholar
27. Wolf, D., Yamakov, Y., Phillpot, S.R., Mukherjee, A.K., Z. Metallk. 94, 1052–1061 (2003).Google Scholar
28. Nicola, L., E. van der Giessen, Needleman, A., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 5920–5928 (2003).Google Scholar