Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-2s2w2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-13T19:28:42.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considerations Limiting Zero-Resistance Currents in High-Temperature Superconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

M. Tinkham
M. Tinkham*
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

The fundamental processes governing the appearance of dissipation due to flux motion in superconductors are reviewed. The dominant thermally‐activated resistive processes are discussed, and evidence for a sharp melting transition of the flux lattice is assessed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 169: Symposium M – High Temperature Superconductors: Fundamental Properties and Novel Materials Processing , 1989 , 849
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Abrikosov, A. A., Eksperim, Zh.. i Teor. Fiz. 32, 1442 (1957) [Soviet Phys.‐JETP 5, 1174 (1957).Google Scholar
2 Bardeen, J. and Stephen, M. J., Phys. Rev. 140, A1197 (1965).Google Scholar
3 Kes, P. H., Aarts, J., van den Berg, J., van der Beek, C. J., and Mydosh, J. A., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 1, 242 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Anderson, P. W. and Kim, Y. B., Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 39 (1964).Google Scholar
5 Tinkham, M., Helv. Phys. Acta 61, 443 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Yeshurun, Y. and Malozemoff, A. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2202 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Tinkham, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1658 (1988).Google Scholar
8 Ambegaokar, V. and Halperin, B. I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1364 (1989).Google Scholar
9 lye, Y., Tamegai, T., Sakakibara, T., Goto, T., Mirua, N., Takeya, H., and Takei, H., Physica C 153‐155, 26 (1988) .Google Scholar
10 Inui, M., Littlewood, P. B., and Coppersmith, S. N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2421 (1989).Google Scholar
11 Nelson, D. R. and Seung, H. S., Phys. Rev. B39, 9153 (1989); A. Houghton, R. A. Pelcovits, and A. Sudbo, Phys. Rev. B40, 6763 (1989); E. H. Brandt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1106 (1989).Google Scholar
12 Fisher, M. P. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1415 (1989).Google Scholar
13 Gammel, P. L., Bishop, D. J., Dolan, G. J., Kwo, J. R., Murray, C. A., Schneemeyer, L. F., and Waszczak, J. V., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2592 (1987).Google Scholar
14 Gammel, P. L., Schneemeyer, L. F., Waszczak, J. V., and Bishop, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1666 (1988).Google Scholar
15 Gupta, A., Esquinazi, P., Braun, H. F., and Neumuller, H.‐W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1869 (1989).Google Scholar
16 Koch, R. H., Foglietti, V., Gallagher, W. J., Koren, G., Gupta, A., and Fisher, M. P. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1511 (1989) .Google Scholar
17 Worthington, T. K., Holtzberg, F. H., and Feild, C. A., preprint.Google Scholar