Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:15:08.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consequences of the Anticipated Long-Term Evolution of Spent Nuclear Fuel for the Assessment of the Release Rate of Radionuclides.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Christophe Poinssot
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, CEA Saclay, Nuclear Energy Division, Department of Physics and Chemistry, Service for the studies of the Radionuclides behaviour, BP11, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex
Patrick Lovera
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, CEA Saclay, Nuclear Energy Division, Department of Physics and Chemistry, Service for the studies of the Radionuclides behaviour, BP11, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex
Cécile Ferry
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, CEA Saclay, Nuclear Energy Division, Department of Physics and Chemistry, Service for the studies of the Radionuclides behaviour, BP11, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex
Jean-Marie Gras
Affiliation:
Electricité de France, R&D Division, Les Renardières,77 Moret-sur-Loing, France
Get access

Abstract

The research conducted in the framework of the French research project on spent nuclear fuel (SNF) long - term evolution (PRECCI Project) has enlightened the potential significance of spent nuclear fuel intrinsic evolution in closed system for the assessment of radionuclide (RN) source term in long-term storage or geological disposal. Beyond others, alpha self-irradiation enhanced diffusion and evolution of the grain boundaries cohesion are two major processes which have to be accounted for in view of the RN source term models development. Accounting for these processes, operational models are developed, the aim of which is to quantitatively define the RN release rates from SNF in long-term storage or geological disposal. They distinguish basically an instantaneous contribution (IRF in geological disposal) and a time-dependent contribution (matrix oxidation or alteration). RN inventories associated to these two different processes have to be modeled since they are time-dependent due to the RN diffusion within the pellet. The present paper details the models that are developed in France in terms of assumptions, conservatism and robustness. It comes out from this work that for the instant release fraction, we have to consider a much higher instant release fraction than classically assumed (5–6% in geological disposal) in particular for geological disposal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Poinssot, C., Toulhoat, P., Piron, J.P., Gras, J.M., Proceedings of Conference GLOBAL′99, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, USA, September 1999.Google Scholar
2. Poinssot, C., Toulhoat, P., Piron, J.P., Cappelaere, C., Desgranges, L., Gras, J.M., in DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile Material Management, proceedings of ANS topical meeting, San-Diego, June 2000 (Amer. Nucl. Soc., LA Grange Park, IL, 2000).Google Scholar
3. Poinssot, C., Jegou, C., Toulhoat, P., Piron, J.P., and Gras, J.M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIV, edited by Hart, K.P. and Lumpkin, G.R. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 663, Warrendale, PA, 2001) pp. 469–4.Google Scholar
4. Poinssot, C., Lovera, P., Fauré, M.H., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV, edited by McGrail, B.P. and Cragnolino, G.A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 713, Warrendale, PA, 2002) pp. 615623.Google Scholar
5. Poinssot, C., Jégou, C., Toulhoat, P., Gras, J.M., Operational models for the spent nuclear fuel radionuclides source term in geological disposal, ICEM'2001 conference, Brugges, Belgium, Octobr 2001, in press. Google Scholar
6. Piron, J.P., Pelletier, M. and Petit, T., Spent nuclear fuel evolution in closed system, ICEM'2001 conference, Brugges, Belgium, October 2001, in press. Google Scholar
7. Poinssot, C., Toulhoat, P., Gras, J.M., Proceedings of GLOBAL '01, Paris, September 2001.Google Scholar
8. Poinssot, C., Toulhoat, P., Lovera, P., Cappelaere, C., Piron, J.P., Desgranges, L., Marimbeau, P., Jegou, C., Gras, J.M., presented at ANS topical meeting on DOE spent fuel and fissile material management proceedings, Charleston, September 2002.Google Scholar
9. Institut for TransUranium Joint Research Center, Annual report 2001.Google Scholar
10. Poinssot, C., Toulhoat, P., Grouiller, J.P., Pavageau, J., Piron, J.P., Pelletier, M., Dehaudt, P., Cappelaere, C., Limon, R., Desgranges, L., Jegou, C., Corbel, C., Maillard, S., Fauré, M.H., Cicariello, J.C., Masson, M., Synthesis on the spent nuclear fuel long-term evolution, CEA report CEA R 5958 (CEA, Paris, 2001).Google Scholar
11. Cappelaere, C., Limon, R., Bredel, T., Herter, T., Gilbon, D., Allègre, S., Bouffioux, P., Mardon, J.P., Long-term behaviour of spent fuel cladding in dry storage conditions, Proceedings of ICEM’2001 Conference, Brugges, Belgium, October 2001, in press. Google Scholar
12. Johnson, L., Tait, J.C. (1997), SKB Technical Report 97–18 (SKB, Stockholm, 1997).Google Scholar
13. Matzke, H.J., Rad. Effects 75, 317 (1983).Google Scholar
14. Matzke, H.J., Presented at the Spent Fuel Workshop, Avignon, September 2002 (proceedings published as CD-ROM).Google Scholar
15. Brémier, S., Walker, C.T., Radiation Effects Defects in Solids, 157, 311 (2002).Google Scholar
16. Vesterlund, G. and Corsetti, L.V., Proceedings of the 1994 International Topical Meeting on Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance, West Palm Beach, Florida, 17–21 April 1994, p. 62.Google Scholar
17. Guérin, Y., Lespiaux, D., Struzik, C. and Caillot, L., Physics and Fuel Performance of Reactor - Based Plutonium Disposition, Workshop Proceedings, Paris, 28 - 30 September 1998 (NEA, Paris, 1998).Google Scholar
18. Koo, Y.H., Lee, B.H., Cheon, J.S., and Sohn, D.S., J. Nucl. Mater. 295, 213 (2001).Google Scholar