Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:43:02.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cold Crucible Vitrification of NPP Operational Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Feodor A. Lifanov
Affiliation:
State Unitary Company SIA ‘Radon’, Moscow, RUSSIA
Michael I. Ojovan
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, UK
Sergey V. Stefanovsky
Affiliation:
State Unitary Company SIA ‘Radon’, Moscow, RUSSIA
Rudolf Burcl
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, A-1400, AUSTRIA
Get access

Abstract

Operational radioactive waste is generated during routine operation of nuclear power plants (NPP). This waste must be solidified in order to ensure safe conditions of storage and disposal. Vitrification of NPP operational waste is a relative new solidification option being developed for last years. The vitrification technology comprises a few stages, starting with evaporation of excess water from liquid radioactive waste, followed by batch preparation, glass melting, and ending with vitrified waste blocks and some relative small amounts of secondary waste. Application of induction high frequency cold crucible type melters facilitates the melting process and significantly reduces the generation of secondary waste. Two types of glasses were designed in order to vitrify operational waste depending on the reactor type at the NPP. For the NPP with RBMK-type reactors the glass 16.2Na2O 0.5K2O 15.5CaO 2.5 Al2O3 1.7Fe2O3 7.5B2O3 48.2SiO2 1.1 Na2SO4 1.2NaCl (5.7 others) was produced. For NPP with WWER reactors the glass 24.0Na2O 1.9K2O 6.2CaO 4.3Al2O3 1.8Fe2O3 9.0B2O3 46.8SiO2 0.8Na2SO4 0.9NaCl (4.3 others) was produced. The melting temperatures of both glass formulations were 1200–1250 C, specific power consumption was 5.2 ± 0.8 kW h/kg, 137Cs loss was within the range 3 - 4 %. The specific radioactivity of glass reached 7.0 MBq/kg. Glass blocks obtained were studied both in laboratory and field conditions. Long-term studies revealed that vitrified NPP operational waste has the minimal impact onto environment. Since the glass has excellent resistance to corrosion it gives the basic possibility of maximal simplification of engineered barrier systems in a disposal facility. The simplest disposal option for vitrified NPP waste is to locate the packages directly into earthen trenches provided the host rock has the necessary sorption and confinement properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sobolev, I.A., Dmitriev, S.A., Lifanov, F.A., Stefanovsky, S.V., and Kobelev, A.P., Waste Management '95. Proc. Int. Symp., Tucson, AZ (1995), Rep. 11–4, CD Rom.Google Scholar
2. Lifanov, F.A., Stefanovsky, S.V., Lashchenova, T.N., Knyazev, O.A., Tolstova, O.V., Chiz-hevskaya, S.V.. Waste Management '2K. Proc. Int. Symp., Tucson, AZ (2000), Rep. 34–2, CD Rom.Google Scholar
3. Puigh, R. 1999. Disposal Facility Data for the Hanford Immobilized Low-Activity Tank Waste. HNF 4950 Rev. 0, Washington, Richland.Google Scholar
4. Dr Song, , Mr You, , Flament, T., Brunellot, P.. Waste Management '01. Proc. Int. Symp., Tucson, AZ (2001), Rep. 127–7, CD Rom.Google Scholar
5. Ojovan, M.I., Ojovan, N.V., Startceva, I.V., Barinov, A.S.. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 663 (2001) 837842. (Sci. Bas. Nucl. Waste Manag. XXIV).Google Scholar