Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T18:35:00.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cobalt and Nickel for Improved Aluminum-Indium Tin Oxide Contact Metallurgy in Polysilicon TFT Display Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Robert S. Howell
Affiliation:
Display Research Lab, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Sambit K. Saha
Affiliation:
Display Research Lab, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Miltiadis K. Hatalis
Affiliation:
Display Research Lab, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Get access

Abstract

Among the issues associated with the fabrication of polysilicon thin film transistor (TFT) active matrix displays is the contact resistance between indium tin oxide (ITO) pixel electrodes and the aluminum data lines. We have investigated the use of Co and Ni for use as barrier layers between the Al and ITO in order to provide good ohmic contacts. For comparison, a titanium barrier layer has also been used and measured. A thin, 10 nm Co layer sufficed to provide good ohmic contacts in an ITO-Co-Al stack, while a thicker layer was required in the case of Ni in order to form a similar good ohmic contact. The contacts have been characterized using resistance measurements in conjunction with X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) in order to correlate the electrical results with the physical metallurgy of the contacts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Weijtens, C.H.L. and can Loon, P. A. C., J. Electrochem Soc. 137, p.3928 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Birkmire, R. W., McCandless, b. E., and Shanfarman, W. N., Solar Cells, 23, p. 115 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Brown, D. M., Ghezzo, M. and Sargent, P. L., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED–25, p. 70 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Sarcona, G.T. and Hatalis, M.K. in Flat Panel Display Materials II, edited by Hatalis, M.K., Kanicki, J., Summers, C.J. and Funada, F. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 424, Pittsburg, PA 1997) p. 159164.Google Scholar
5. Saha, S., Howell, R. S. and Hatalis, M. K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., this volume, (1998).Google Scholar