Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:54:27.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Properties of A-Si:H Interface Layers on Oxide-Covered and Hydrogen-Terminated Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Jürgen Knobloch
Affiliation:
Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 253, D-69120 Heidelberg
Peter Hess
Affiliation:
Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 253, D-69120 Heidelberg
Get access

Abstract

High quality a-Si:H films were deposited by pulsed VUV (157nm) laser CVD, allowing digital control of the deposition process. Nucleation and growth on native oxide-covered Si (100) and on H-terminated Si (111) surfaces were studied in situ by FTIR transmission spectroscopy with sub-monolayer sensitivity. The film thickness was monitored simultaneously using a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) with comparable resolution. The in situ spectra reveal that the nature of the substrate surface significantly influences the hydrogen bonding configuration in the interface region. In both cases the assumed cluster growth during the initial stage is characterized by a band around 2100cm−1, which is assigned to SiHX (x = 1 – 3) surface modes. This band broadens until the clusters coalesce and band saturation occurs. At this time a second band starts to grow at 2000cm−1, which is attributed to bulk SiH bonds. Difference spectra calculated for layers at different depths with definite thickness and the deconvolution of the broad feature observed during the very first stage of film growth indicate the existence of a hydrogen-rich layer at the substrate surface whose composition and thickness depend on the properties of the substrate surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Blayo, N. and Drevillon, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (8) 950 (1991)Google Scholar
[2] Nguyen, H. Lu, Y., Kim, S., Wakagi, M., Collins, R. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (19) 3880 (1995)Google Scholar
[3] Morrison, P. W. and Haigis, J. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 11 (3) 490 (1993)Google Scholar
[4] Toyoshima, Y., Matsuda, A., and Arai, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166 103 (1993)Google Scholar
[5] Katiyar, M., Yang, Y.H. and Abelson, J.R., J. Appl. Phys. 77 (12) 6247 (1995)Google Scholar
[6] Higashi, G.S., Chabal, Y.J., Trucks, G.W. and Raghavachari, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 656 (1990)Google Scholar
[7] Karstens, H., Knobloch, J., Winkler, A., Barth, M., Hess, P., Appl. Surf. Sci. 86 521 (1994)Google Scholar
[8] Sauerbrey, G., Z. Phys. 155 206 (1959)Google Scholar
[9] Jackson, R.L. and Tyndall, G.W., J. Appl. Phys. 62 (1) 315 (1987)Google Scholar
[10] Swanepoel, R., J. Phys. Sci. Instrum. 16 1214 (1983)Google Scholar
[11] Chabal, Y.J, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 259 349 (1992)Google Scholar
[12] Uram, K.J. and Janson, U., Surf. Sci. 249 105 (1991)Google Scholar