Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:50:42.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of Al2O3, ZrO2 and SrTiO3 from Analysis of Reflection Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy in the Valence Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

G. L. Tan
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Materials Science Dept. 3231 Walnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
L. K. Denoyer
Affiliation:
Deconvolution and Entropy Consulting, 755 Snyder Hill, Ithaca NY 14850, USA
R. H. French
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Materials Science Dept. 3231 Walnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA DuPont Corporation Central Research, E356–384, Exp. St., Wilmington, Delaware 19880–0356, USA.
A. Ramos
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science.& Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
M. Gautier-Soyer
Affiliation:
Service de Physique et Chimie des Surfaces et Interfaces, CEA Saclay, France.
Y. M. Chiang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science.& Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Get access

Abstract

Characterization of thin surficial films of oxides has become the focus of increased interest due to their applications in microelectronics. The ability to experimentally determine the electronic structure and optical properties of oxide materials permits the direct study of the interband transitions from the valence to the conduction band states. In the past years there has been much progress in the quantitative analysis of transmission electron energy loss spectroscopy (TEELS) in the electron microscope

Here we employed reflection electron energy loss function (REELS) as well as vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) spectroscopy to determine the dielectric functions of oxide materials, i.e. Al2O3, ZrO2 and SrTiO3. The two main steps in the analysis are the removal of the effects of multiple scattering from the REELS spectra followed by application of the Kramers-Kronig dispersion transforms to the single scattering energy loss function to determine the conjugate optical variable and then the complex dielectric function. The surface and bulk plasma resonance spectra for these oxide materials have been determined from VUV and REELS, along with the influence of primary electron energy on the REELS results. The relative contribution of surface and bulk plasmon oscillation in REELS has been investigated. Comparison with VUV results and existing TEELS results indicate that Kramers-Kronig analysis can also be applied to REELS spectra and the corresponding conjugate optical properties can be obtained. Quantitative studies of the electronic structure and optical properties of thin surficial films using VUV and REELS or TEELS, represent a new avenue to determine the properties of these increasingly important films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Werner, W. S. M., “Electron Transport in Solids For Quantitative Surface Analysis”, Surface and Interface Analysis, 31, 141–76, (2001).Google Scholar
2 Tanuma, S., Powell, C.J., Penn, D.R., Surf. Interf. Anal. 21, 1993 Google Scholar
3 Werner, W. S. M., “Obtaining Quantitative Information On Surface Excitations From Reflection Electron Energy-loss Spectroscopy (REELS)”, Surface and Interface Analysis, 35, 347–53, (2003).Google Scholar
4 Bortz, M. L., French, R. H., “Quantitative, FFT-Based, Kramers Kronig Analysis for Reflectance Data”, Applied Spectroscopy, 43, 8, 14981501 (1989).Google Scholar
5 Dorneich, A. D., French, R. H., Müllejans, H., Loughin, S., Rühle, M., “Quantitative Analysis of Valence Electron Energy-Loss Spectra of Aluminum Nitride”, Journal of Microscopy, 191, 3, 286–96 (1998).Google Scholar
6 Yubero, F. et al, Surf. Interf. Anal. 22, 124, 1994.Google Scholar
7 Yubero, F. et al, Surf. Sci. 237 (1990) 173]Google Scholar
8 van Benthem, K., Elsässer, C., French, R. H., “Bulk Electronic Structure of SrTiO3: Experiment and Theory”, Journal of Applied Physics, 90, 12, 6156–64, (2001).Google Scholar
9 van Benthem, K., French, R. H., Sigle, W. Elsässer, C., Rühle, M., “Valence Electron Energy Loss Study of Fe Doped SrTiO3 and a Σ13 Boundary: Electronic Structure and Dispersion Forces”, Ultramicroscopy, 86, 34, 303–18, (2001).Google Scholar
10 Frye, A., French, R.H., Bonnell, D.A., Z. Metallkd. 94 (2003) 3 Google Scholar
11 Henrich, V.E. and Cox, P.A., The Surface Science of Metal Oxides, Cambridge University Press (1994) 202 Google Scholar
12 French, R. H., Müllejans, H., Jones, D. J., “Optical Properties of Aluminum Oxide: Determined from Vacuum Ultraviolet and Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopies”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 81, 10, 2549–57 (1998).Google Scholar
13 French, R. H., Glass, S. J., Ohuchi, F. S., Xu, Y.-N, Zandiehnadem, F., Ching, W. Y., “Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of Three Phases of ZrO2 ”, Physical Review B, 49, 8, 5133–42 (1994).Google Scholar