Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T10:51:19.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Characterization of Irradiation Damage in Reactor Graphite Using High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy and Raman Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2012

A. N. Jones ,
L. McDermott  and
B. J. Marsden
A. N. Jones
Affiliation:
Nuclear Graphite Research Group, Research Centre for Radwaste & Decommissioning, School of MACE, University of Manchester, UK
L. McDermott
Affiliation:
Nuclear Graphite Research Group, Research Centre for Radwaste & Decommissioning, School of MACE, University of Manchester, UK
B. J. Marsden
Affiliation:
Nuclear Graphite Research Group, Research Centre for Radwaste & Decommissioning, School of MACE, University of Manchester, UK
Get access

Abstract

Nuclear graphite components are produced from polycrystalline artificial graphite manufactured from binder and filler coke material with approximately 20% porosity. During the operational lifetime of a nuclear reactor the graphite moderator is subjected to fast neutron irradiation which contributes to changes in material and physical properties such as thermal expansion co-efficient, young’s modulus and dimensional change. These changes are directly driven by irradiation induced changes to the crystal structure as reflected through the bulk microstructure. Therefore it is important that irradiation changes and there implications on component property changes are understood. Work carried out under the FP7 CARBOWASTE consortium under work package three is underway to characterize both structural and radiological damage in graphite. This study examines a range of irradiated graphite samples removed from the British Experimental Pile Zero (BEPO) reactor. Raman spectroscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) have been used to compare the effect of increased irradiation Fluence on graphite microstructure. Irradiation induced crystal defects and changes in crystallite size are observed using TEM and related to Raman Spectroscopy, comparisons are also made to virgin nuclear grade graphite.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1475: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXV , 2012 , imrc11-1475-nw35-o10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kelly, B. T., Carbon 20, 3–11 (1982).10.1016/0008-6223(82)90066-5Google Scholar
2. Kelly, B. T., The physics of graphite (Applied Science Publishers, London, 1981).Google Scholar
3. Simmons, J. H. W., Radiation Damage in Graphite, Vol. Chapter 2. (Oxford 1965).10.1016/B978-0-08-013753-7.50018-2Google Scholar
4. Thrower, P. A. and Reynolds, W. N., Journal of Nuclear Materials 8, 221–226 (1963).10.1016/0022-3115(63)90037-0Google Scholar
5. Thrower, P. A., in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Vol. 5, edited by Walker, P. L. (Dekker, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
6. Wickham, A. J., “Deposition of Graphite Samples from BEPO as Supplied to NIREX,” (2007).Google Scholar
7. Dickinson, J. L., Kinchin, G. H., Jackson, R. F., Lomer, W. M., and Simmons, J. H. W., “BEPO Wigner Energy Release,” (1958).Google Scholar
8. Huang, Y. Z., Lozano-Perez, S., Langford, R. M., Titchmarsh, J. M., and Jenkins, M. L., Journal of microscopy 207, 129–136 (2002).10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01050.xGoogle Scholar
9. Langford, R. M., Microscopy Research and Technique 69, 538–549 (2006).10.1002/jemt.20324Google Scholar
10. Langford, R. M., Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology 6, 661–668 (2006).10.1166/jnn.2006.111Google Scholar
11. Langford, R. M. and Clinton, C., Micron 35, 607–611 (2004).10.1016/j.micron.2004.03.002Google Scholar
12. Langford, R. M., Dale, G., Hopkins, P. J., Ewen, P. J. S., and Petford-Long, A. K., Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 12, 111–114 (2002).10.1088/0960-1317/12/2/303Google Scholar
13. Ferrari, A. C., Solid State Communications 143, 47–57 (2007).10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052Google Scholar
14. Ferrari, A. C. and Robertson, J., Journal of Physics Review B 61, 14095–14107 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095Google Scholar
15. Thomsen, C. and Reich, S., Physical Review Letters 85, 5214 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5214Google Scholar
16. Nemanich, R. J. and Solin, S. A., Solid State Communications 23, 417–420 (1977).10.1016/0038-1098(77)90998-XGoogle Scholar
17. Mrozowski, S., Proceedings of the Conference on Carbon 31–45 (1953).Google Scholar
18. Wise, M., edited by P. P. a. E. Division (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority).Google Scholar
19. Tuinstra, F. and Koeing, J. K., The Journal of Chemical Physics 53, 1126–1130 (1970).10.1063/1.1674108Google Scholar
20. Knight, D. S. and White, W. B., Journal of Materials Research 4, 385–393 (1989).10.1557/JMR.1989.0385Google Scholar