Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:32:04.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization and Reactivity of Hybrid Organosilicate Mesoporous Sieves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Lim  and
A. Stein
M. Lim
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, stein@chem.umn.edu
A. Stein
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, stein@chem.umn.edu
Get access

Abstract

Vinyl-MCM-41 has been synthesized by a direct synthesis from the corresponding organosiloxane precursors. The location of vinyl groups on the internal channel surfaces of the mesoporous silicate sieves was confirmed by small angle neutron scattering (SANS) experiments using contrast matching techniques. To investigate further modification of the vinyl groups, bromination reactions were carried out on vinyl-MCM-41 samples in dichloromethane, carbon tetrachloride, and in a gas-phase reaction. With dichloromethane as a solvent, the bromination rate increased with increasing pore diameter. A strong dependence of the reaction rate on the presence and type of solvent molecules was observed. While gas-phase bromination was complete within 40 minutes, the reaction required several days for completion in dichloromethane and was even slower in the nonpolar solvent, carbon tetrachloride.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 519: Symposium O – Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Materials , 1998 , 89
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Corma, A., Chem. Rev. 97, 2373–2419 (1997).10.1021/cr960406nGoogle Scholar
2 Beck, J. S., Calabro, D. C., McCullen, S. B., Pelrine, B. P., Schmitt, K. D., Vartuli, J. C., U.S. Patent No. 5 145 816 (1992).Google Scholar
3 Aronson, B. J., Blanford, C. F., Stein, A., Chem. Mater. 9, 2842–2851 (1997).10.1021/cm970180kGoogle Scholar
4 Lim, M. H., Blanford, C. F., Stein, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 4090–4091 (1997).10.1021/ja9638824Google Scholar
5 Lim, M. H., Blanford, C. F., Stein, A., Chem. Mater. 10, 467–470 (1998).10.1021/cm970713pGoogle Scholar
6 Burkett, S. L., Sims, S. D., Mann, S., Chem. Commun., 1367–1368 (1996).Google Scholar
7 Sims, S. D., Burkett, S. L., Mann, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 431, 77–82 (1996).10.1557/PROC-431-77Google Scholar
8 Macquarrie, D. J., Chem. Commun., 1961–1962 (1996).Google Scholar
9 Huo, Q., Margolese, D. I., Stucky, G. D., Chem. Mater. 8, 1147–1160 (1996).10.1021/cm960137hGoogle Scholar
10 Brown, R. S., H. Slebocka-Tilk, Bennet, A. J., Bellucci, G., Bianchini, R., Ambrosetti, R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 6310–6316 (1990).10.1021/ja00173a019Google Scholar
11 Carrado, K. A., Thiyagarajan, P., Winans, R. E., Botto, R. E., Inorg. Chem. 30, 794–799 (1991).10.1021/ic00004a034Google Scholar
12 Bradley, K. F., Chen, S. H., Thiyagarajan, P., Phys. Rev. A 42, 6015–6023 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevA.42.6015Google Scholar
13 Glinka, C. J., Nicol, J. M., Stucky, G. D., Ramli, E., Margolese, D., Huo, Q., Higgins, J. B., Leonowicz, M. E., J. Porous Materials 3, 93–98 (1996).10.1007/BF01186038Google Scholar
14 Bendedouch, D., Chen, S.-H., Koehler, W. C., J. Phys. Chem. 87, 153–159 (1983).10.1021/j100224a033Google Scholar
15 Bellucci, G., Bianchini, R., Chiappe, C., Lenoir, D., Attar, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 6243–6248 (1995).10.1021/ja00128a010Google Scholar
16 Bellucci, G., Chiappe, C., Bianchini, R., Lenoir, D., Herges, R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 12001–12002 (1995).10.1021/ja00153a025Google Scholar