Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:21:28.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization and Biocompatibility Studies of Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembled Humic Acid/Fe3+ Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Izabela Galeska
Affiliation:
Nanomaterials Optoelectronics Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Polymer Program, Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3136
Tammy Hickey
Affiliation:
Center for Biomaterials & Surgical Research Center, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-1615
Francis Moussy
Affiliation:
Center for Biomaterials & Surgical Research Center, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-1615
Get access

Abstract

A semipermeable and non-inflammatory membrane is a prerequisite for the development of an implantable biosensor for continuous pain free monitoring of glucose levels in vivo. Humic acids (HAs) have been reported to have therapeutically relevant characteristics such as antiviral and anti-inflammatory.[1] This encouraged us to investigate the in vivo compatibility of HAs based multilayered films as a potential membrane material for implantable glucose sensors. Electrostatic layer-by-layer self-assembly technique of HAs with oppositely charged ferric ions was utilized to grow these films. Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and ellipsometric studies have shown repeatable, stepwise increase in mass and in film thickness during self-assembly. The growth of these assemblies exhibited strong dependence on pH and ionic strength of HAs solution and was correlated with the degree of ionization of carboxyl groups and the neutralization induced surface spreading. HAs films used in the biocompatibility study were very well tolerated by the tissue and no difference with silastic tubing, used as control, could be observed. All types of samples, including the controls, induced similar long-term tissue reaction showing almost no inflammation and a light to moderate fibrosis with some blood vessels present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Klocking, R., Humic substances as potential therapeutics, Humic substances in the global environment and implications on human health, ed. Senesi, N. and Miano, T. M., (Elsevier Science B. V.,1992), pp.12451257.Google Scholar
[2] Moussy, F., Jakeway, S., Harrison, D. J., and Rajotte, R. V., Anal. Chem., 66, 3882–8, (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Mercado, R. C. and Moussy, F., Biosens. Bioelect., 13, 133145, (1998).Google Scholar
[4] Galeska, I., Chattopadhyay, D., Moussy, F., and Papadimitrakopoulos, F., Biomacromolecules, 1, 202207, 2000.Google Scholar
[5] Moussy, F., Personal Communication, 2000.Google Scholar
[6] Davies, G., Fataftah, A., Radwan, A., Raffauf, R. F., Ghabbour, E. A., and Jansen, S. A., The Science of the Total Environment, 201, 7987, (1997).Google Scholar
[7] Ghabbour, E. A., Khairy, A. H., Cheney, D. P., Gross, V., Davis, G., Gilbert, T. R., and Zhang, X. J., J. Appl. Phycol., 6, 459, (1994).Google Scholar
[8] Radwan, A., Willey, R. J., Davies, G., Fataftah, A., Ghabbour, E. A., and Jansen, S. A., J. Appl. Phycol., 8, 545551, (1997).Google Scholar
[9] Radwan, A., Davies, G., Fataftah, A., Ghabbour, E. A., Jansen, S. A., and Willey, R. J., J. Appl. Phycol., 8, 553562, (1997).Google Scholar
[10] Stevenson, F. J., Humus Chemistry, (Wiley & Sons, 1994), pp. 125 Google Scholar
[11] Stevenson, F. J., Humus Chemistry, (Wiley & Sons, 1994), pp. 234239.Google Scholar
[12] Livens, F. R., Environmental Pollution, 70, 183208, (1991).Google Scholar
[13] Vermeer, A. W. P. and Koopal, L. K., Langmuir, 14, 42104216, (1998).Google Scholar
[14] Vermeer, A. W. P., Riemsdijk, W. H. v., and Koopal, L. K., Langmuir, 14, 28102819, (1998).Google Scholar
[15] Fein, J. B., Boily, J.-F., Guclu, K., and Kaulbach, E., Chemical Geology, 162, 3345, (1999).Google Scholar
[16] Schulthess, C. P. and Huang, C. P., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55, 3442, (1991).Google Scholar
[17] Schlautman, M. A. and Morgan, J. J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 58, 42934303, (1994).Google Scholar
[18] Jones, K. L. and O'Melia, C. R., Journal of Membrane Science, 165, 3146, (2000).Google Scholar
[19] Ngah, W. S. W. and Musa, A., J. Appl. Pol. Sci., 69, 23052310, (1998).Google Scholar
[20] Sauerbrey, G. Z., Z. Phys., 155, 206, (1957).Google Scholar
[21] Ghosh, K. and Schnitzer, M., Soil Science, 129, 266276, (1980).Google Scholar
[22] Bohn, H. L., McNeal, B. L., and O'Connor, G. A., Soil Chemistry. New York: (Wiley, 1985).Google Scholar
[23] Swift, R. S., Humic Substances II. In Search of Structure, ed. Hayes, M. H. B., (Wiley, 1989), pp. 449.Google Scholar
[24] Decher, G., Science, 277, 12321237, (1997).Google Scholar