Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T12:24:46.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in Stress and Microstructure in PtMn/CoFe Bilayers during Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

S.P. Bozeman
Affiliation:
Seagate Recording Heads, 7801 Computer Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55435-5489
B.J. Daniels
Affiliation:
Seagate Recording Heads, 7801 Computer Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55435-5489
D.J. Larson
Affiliation:
Seagate Recording Heads, 7801 Computer Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55435-5489
Get access

Abstract

PtMn is one of several candidate antiferromagnetic materials for biasing of spin valve giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensors used in magnetic recording heads. The as-deposited crystal structure of PtMn is face-centered cubic, which is not antiferromagnetic, and it is commonly annealed to transform it to the ordered face-centered tetragonal structure, which is antiferromagnetic. The changes in the thin film stress during this transformation can be up to 1.5 GPa in magnitude. In this work, the stresses in sputter-deposited, PtMn/CoFe bilayers were measured during annealing using a laser-based wafer curvature technique. During annealing, the stress initially increases before approaching a constant level. This behavior was examined for samples with a range of PtMn compositions and varying degrees of PtMn {111} texture. Both the magnitude and rate of change of the stress are sensitive to the composition of the films, but are relatively insensitive to the film texture. These results are discussed in terms of the binary alloy phase diagram.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dieny, B., Speriosu, V.S., Parkin, S.S.P., Gurney, B.A., Wilhoit, D.R., and Mauri, D., Phys Rev B 43, 1297 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.43.1297Google Scholar
2. Tsang, C., Fontana, R.E., Lin, T., Heim, D.E., Speriosu, V.S., Gurney, B.A., and Williams, M.L., IEEE Trans Mag 30, 3801 (1994).10.1109/20.333909Google Scholar
3. Kools, J.C.S., IEEE Trans Mag 32, 3165 (1996).10.1109/20.508381Google Scholar
4. Cullity, B.D., Introduction to Magnetic Materials, (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1972), p. 267.Google Scholar
5. Lederman, M., IEEE Trans Mag 35, 794 (1999).10.1109/20.750647Google Scholar
6. Linn, T., Tsang, C., Fontana, R.E., and Howard, J.K., IEEE Trans Mag 31, 2585 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Daniels, B., Bozeman, S., and Ha, H., in Thin Films-Stresses and Mechanical Properties VIII, ed. Vinci, R., Besser, P., Kraft, O., Moody, N., and Shaffer, E. II (Materials Research Society, 1999).Google Scholar
8. Smith, D. L., Thin-Film Deposition, (McGraw-Hill, 1995) p. 441.Google Scholar
9. Porter, D.A. and Easterling, K.E., Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, (Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Ltd, Berkshire, England, 1981), p. 290.Google Scholar
10. Massalski, T.B., ed., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM International, 1990), p. 2589.Google Scholar