Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T13:05:51.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Capacity Enhancement of Room Temperature Hydrogen Storage in HiPco SWNT by Electrochemical deposition of Palladium Nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yong-Won Lee
Affiliation:
ywlee@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Materials Science and Engineering, Room 210, 476 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States
Ranadeep Bhowmick
Affiliation:
ranadeep@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, United States
Bruce M. Clemens
Affiliation:
bmc@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, United States
Get access

Abstract

A Sieverts apparatus for small quantity samples has been implemented by employing a very small volume pressure reservoir and a sample chamber of less than 1 ml. The hydrogen storage capacity of a commercially available, HiPco (high pressure CO conversion) single-wall carbon nanotube (SWNT) was measured over a hydrogen pressure range of 0-35 Bar at room temperature. The sample contained approximately 5 wt% of residual Fe catalyst, and showed 0.17 wt% of hydrogen uptake capacity at 30 Bar of hydrogen pressure. Palladium nanoparticles were deposited on the SWNT via electrochemical method (EC) from H2PdCl4 solution. The storage capacity of the SWNT with EC-doped Pd was increased to 0.52 wt% at 30 Bar, which corresponds to the capacity enhancement by a factor between 2.8 and 3.1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kajiura, H., Tsutsui, S., Kadono, K., Kakuta, M., Ata, M., and Murakami, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, (2003) 1105 Google Scholar
2. Takagi, H., Hatori, H., Soneda, Y., Yoshizawa, N., and Yamada, Y., Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 108, (2004) 143 Google Scholar
3. Zacharia, R., Kim, K. Y., Kibria, A. Fazle, Nahm, K. S., Chem. Phys. Lett. 412, (2005) 369 Google Scholar
4. Lueking, A. D., and Yang, R. T., Appl. Catal. A, 265, (2004) 259 Google Scholar
5. Yoo, E., Gao, L., Komatsu, T., Yagai, N., Arai, K., Yamazaki, T., Matsuishi, K., Matsumoto, T., and Nakamura, J., J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, (2004) 18903 Google Scholar
6. Lee, Y.-W., Clemens, B. M., and Gross, K. J., in preparationGoogle Scholar
7. Choi, H. C., Shim, M., Bangsaruntip, S., and Dai, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. Commun. 124, (2002) 9058 Google Scholar
8. Eastman, J. A., Thompson, L. J., and Kestel, B. J., Phys. Rev. B, 48, (1993) 84 Google Scholar
9. Zuttel, A., Nuzenadel, Ch., Schmid, G., Chartouni, D., and Schlapbach, L., J. Alloys Compd. 293–295, (1999) 472 Google Scholar
10. Kishore, S., Nelson, J. A., Adair, J. H., and Eklund, P. C., J. Alloys Compd. 389, (2005) 234 Google Scholar