Skip to main content Accessibility help

Building Stakeholder Confidence by Reducing the Gulf between Experimental Data and Model Predictions in Assessments of Repository Performance

  • Kaye P. Hart (a1)


Confidence in the ability of repository systems to isolate high level wastes from the environment can be strengthened by placing greater reliance on robust designs for the repository system, and by using multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate that parameters, models and predictions developed for the repository are relevant. A particularly useful approach is to demonstrate that models and predictions incorporate processes that have been shown to be important in existing natural systems.



Hide All
[1] OECD/NEA, The Environmental and Ethical Basis for Geological Disposal: a Collective Opinion of the Radioactive Waste Committee, OECD/NEA Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France (1995) /html/rwm/reports/1995/geodisp/geological-disposal.pdf.
[2] OECD/NEA, The Handling of Timescales in Assessing Post-closure Safety Lessons Learnt from the April 2002 Workshop in Paris, France, NEA No. 4435, OECD/NEA Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France (2004) timescales.pdf.
[3] Nagra, Project Opalinua Clay: Safety Report, Demonstration Of Disposal Feasibility For Spent Fuel, Vitrified High-Level Waste And Long-lived Intermediate-level Waste, Nagra Technical Report NTB 02-05 (2002).
[4] Pirlet, V., J. Nucl. Mat., 298, 4754 (2001).
[5] Iseghem, P. Van, Aertsens, M., Gin, S., Deneele, D., Grambow, B., McGrail, P., Strachan, D., Wicks, G. and McMenamin, T., this volume (2004).
[6] Inagaki, Y., Furuya, H., Idemitsu, K. and Arima, T., Prog. Nucl. Energy, 32, 501508 (1998).
[7] Shoesmith, D. W., J. Nucl. Mat., 282, 131 (2000).
[8] OECD/NEA, Safety of Disposal of Spent Fuel, HLW and Long-Lived ILW In Switzerland, An International Peer Review of the Post-Closure Radiological Safety Assessment for Disposal in the Opalinus Clay of the Zürcher Weinland, NEA No. 5568, OECD/NEA Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France (2004)
[9] Ringwood, A. E., Kesson, S. E., Ware, N. G., Hibberson, W. and Major, A., Nature, 278, 219223 (1979).
[10] McCarthy, G. J., Nucl. Tech., 32, 92 (1977).
[11] Ewing, R. C. and Macfarlane, A., Science, 296, 659660 (2002).
[12] OECD/NEA, Engineered Barrier Systems and the Safety of Deep Geological Repositories State-of-the-art Report in Co-Operation with the European Commission, EUR 19964 EN, OECD/NEA Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France (2003)
[13] OECD/NEA, Engineered Barrier Systems (EBS): Design Requirements and Constraints, Workshop Proceedings, Turku, Finland, 26-29 August 2003 (2003).
[14] Smellie, J. A. T. and Karlsson, F., Eng. Geol., 52, 193220 (1999).
[15] Miller, W., Alexander, R., Chapman, N., McKinley, I. and Smellie, J., Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes and Natural Analogues, (Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, New York, 2000).
[16] Kim, J. I., Nucl. Eng. Design, 202, 143155 (2000).
[17] Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J. (Editors), Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, Wiley-Interscience publication in Environmental Science and Technology, Series Editors, Schnoor, Jerald L. and Zehnder, Alexander (John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996).
[18] Payne, T. E., Edis, R., Fenton, B. R. and Waite, T. D., J. Env. Rad. 57, 3555 2001.
[19] Delakowitz, B., Meinrath, G. and Spiegel, W., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. Letters, 213, 109125 (1996).
[20] Jacquier, P., Meier, P. and Ly, J., Appl. Geochem., 16, 8593 (2001).
[21] Poinssot, C., Baleens, B. and Bradbury, M. H., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 63, 32173227 (1999).
[22] McKinley, I. G. and Alexander, W. R., J. Contam. Hydrol. 13, 249259 (1993).
[23] Börjesson, S. and Emrén, A., Comp. & Geosci., 24, 839846 (1998).
[24] Hart, K. P., Reducing the long-term Environmental impact of Wastes Arising from Uranium Mining, in Energy, Waste, and the Environment: A Geological Perspective, (Geological Society, London, in Press).
[25] Bruno, J., Duro, L., Pablo, J. de, Casas, I., Ayora, C., Delgado, J., Gimeno, M. J., Peña, J., Linklater, C., Villar, L. Pérez del and Gómez, P., Chem. Geol., 151, 277291 (1998).
[26] Curti, E., Appl. Geochem., 14, 433445 (1999).
[27] Bruno, J., Duro, L. and Grivé, M., Chem. Geol., 190, 371393 (2002).
[28] Möri, A., Alexander, W. R., Geckeis, H., Hauser, W., Schäfer, T., Eikenberg, J., Fierz, Th., Degueldre, C. and Missana, T., Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 217, 3347 (2003)
[29] McKinley, I. G., Hagenlocher, I., Alexander, W. R. and Schwyn, B., FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 20, 545556 (1997).
[30] Meike, A. and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Review of Microbial Responses to Abiotic Environmental Factors in the Context of the Proposed Yucca Mountain Repository, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report AECL-12101 (2000).
[31] Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and King, F., Microbially Influenced Corrosion Issues in High-Level Nuclear Waste Repositories, Proceedings of CORROSION 2002 Research Topical Symposium Microbially Influenced Corrosion (B. Little Chair), NACE International, Houston TX (2002).
[32] West, J. M., McKinley, I. G. and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Microbial Effects on Waste Repository Materials, Microbiology and Radioactivity, Keith-Roach, M.J. and Livens, F.R., Editors (Elsevier Science, 2002).
[33] West, J. M. and McKinley, I. G., The Geomicrobiology of Radioactive Waste Disposal, The Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology, Editor Bitton, G., 26612674 (John Wiley, 2002).
[34] Smellie, J. A. T., Karlsson, F. and Alexander, W. R., J. Contam. Hydrol., 26, 317 (1997).
[35] Crespo, M. T., Villar, L. Pérez del, Quejido, A. J., Sónchez, M., Cózar, J. S. and Fernóndez-Díaz, M., Appl. Geochem., 18, 12511266 (2003).
[36] Gauthier-Lafaye, F., C. R. Phys., 3, 839849 (2002).
[37] Gurban, I., Laaksoharju, M., Madé, B. and Ledoux, E., J. Contam. Hydrol., 61, 247264 (2003).
[38] Quiñones, J., Serrano, J. and Arocas, P. Diaz, J. Nucl. Mat. 298, 6368 (2001).
[39] McKinley, I. G. and Savage, D., J. Contam. Hydrol., 21, 335350 (1996).
[40] McKinley, I. G., Waste Manage. 17, 18 (1997).
[41] OECD/NEA, Establishing and Communicating Confidence in the Safety of Deep Geologic Disposal: Approaches and Arguments, OECD/NEA Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France (2002).
[42] Browning, L., Murphy, W. M., Manepally, C. and Fedors, R., Comp & Geosci., 29, 247263 (2003).
[43] Smith, P. A., Alexander, W. R., Kickmaier, W., Ota, K., Frieg, B. and McKinley, I. G., J. Contam. Hydrol., 47, 335348 (2001).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Building Stakeholder Confidence by Reducing the Gulf between Experimental Data and Model Predictions in Assessments of Repository Performance

  • Kaye P. Hart (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.