Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-2s2w2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T05:03:18.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bounding Analysis for Solubility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

T. Ohi
Affiliation:
Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki-ken, JAPAN 319–11, ooitakao@tokai.pnc.go.jp.
K. Nakajima
Affiliation:
Nuclear Energy System Incorporation, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki-ken, JAPAN 319–11.
Get access

Abstract

In performance assessment of geological disposal systems for High Level Radioactive Waste (HLW), the change of environment over the long-term must be considered. Therefore, it is necessary to consider a wide range of parameters concerned with radionuclides migration, especially the dependence of solubility on geochemical environment. In this study, assuming that the release rate of the nuclides from buffer material is limited by inventory ultimately, the relationship between the initial inventory and the solubility that produces a solubility-invariant maximum release rate from the buffer is examined by using a simple steady-state analytical solution without decay. As the result, the threshold of “effective” solubility in the performance assessment of the geological disposal systems for HLW is obtained as a function of initial inventory, distribution coefficient (Kd), diffusion coefficient, and thickness, porosity and density of the buffer. Also, the threshold of “effective” steady dissolution rate corresponding to the threshold of “effective” solubility is obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Neretnieks, I., Diffusivities of Some Constituents in Compacted wet Bentonite Clay and the Impact on Radionuclide Migration in the Buffer, Nuclear Technology, 71 pp. 458470, (1985).Google Scholar
2. Apted, M. J., Hodgkinson, D. P., Logic Over Rhetoric: The Role of Performance Analysis in Guiding Near-Field Data Collection, Proceedings Nuclear Waste Packaging FOCUS 91, pp. 2431, (1991).Google Scholar
3. Zavoshy, S. J., Chambre, P. L., and Pigford, T. H., Mass Transfer in a Geologic Environment, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 44, pp. 311322, (1985).Google Scholar
4. Pigford, T. H., and Chambre, P. L., Near- Field Mass Transfer in Geologic Disposal Systems A Review, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 112, pp. 125141, (1988).Google Scholar
5. PNC, Research and Development on Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste, PNCTN 1410 93–059, (1993).Google Scholar
6. Ohi, T., Miyahara, K., Naito, M., Umeki, H., Effects of Transport Model Alternatives Incorporating Precipitation on The Performance of Engineered Barriers, High Level Radioactive Waste Management Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Conference, pp. 274275, (1996).Google Scholar