Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:51:41.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Au/Zn Contacts to p-InP: Electrical and Metallurgical Characteristics and the Relationship Between Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Victor G. Weizer
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135
Navid S. Fatemi
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135 NYMA, Inc., Lewis Research Center Group, Brook Park, OH 44142
Andras L. Korenyi-both
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135 Calspan Corp., Cleveland, OH 44135
Get access

Abstract

The metallurgical and electrical behavior of Au/Zn contacting metallization onp-type InP was investigated as a function of the Zn content in the metallization. It was found that ohmic behavior can be achieved with Zn concentrations as small as 0.05 atomic percent Zn. For Zn concentrations between 0.1 and 36 at.%, the contact resistivity ρc was found to be independent of the Zn content For low Zn concentrations the realization of ohmic behavior was found to require the growth of the compound Au2P3 at the metal-InP interface. The magnitude of ρc is shown to be very sensitive to the growth rate of the interfacial Au2P3 layer. The possibility of exploiting this sensitivity to provide low resistance contacts while avoiding the semiconductor structural damage that is normally attendant to contact formation is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Fatemi, N.S. and Weizer, V.G., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 6740 (1993).Google Scholar
2 Clausen, T. and Leistiko, O., Microelect. Eng. 18, 305 (1992).Google Scholar
3 Tabatabaie, K., Choudhurt, A.N., Slater, N.J., & Fonstad, C.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 398 (1982).Google Scholar
4 Boos, J. B. and Kruppa, W., Solid-State Electron. 31, 127 (1988).Google Scholar
5 Cheng, C.L., Coldren, L.A., Miller, B.I., and Rentschler, J A., Electron. Lett. 18, 755 (1982).Google Scholar
6 Kuphal, E., Solid-State Electron. 2 4, 69 (1981).Google Scholar
7 Tseng, W., Christou, A., Day, H., Davey, J., & Wilkens, B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 19, 623 (1981).Google Scholar
8 Schiavone, L.M. and Pritchard, A.A., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 452 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Fatemi, N.S. and G.Weizer, V., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 2111 (1989).Google Scholar
10 Barcz, A.J., Kaminska, E., and Piotrowska, A., Thin Solid Films 149, 251 (1987).Google Scholar
11 Thiel, F.A., Bacon, D.D., Beuhler, E., & Bachmann, K.J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 317 (1977).Google Scholar
12 Weizer, V. G. and Fatemi, N. S., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 8253 (1991).Google Scholar
13 Fatemi, N.S. and G.Weizer, V., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 1934 (1990).Google Scholar