Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T04:38:03.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomistic Simulation of Formation and Structure of Misfit Dislocations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A.S. Nandedkar
Affiliation:
Theoretical Modeling Department, IBM Hast Fishkill Laboratory, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533–0999
C.S. Murthy
Affiliation:
Theoretical Modeling Department, IBM Hast Fishkill Laboratory, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533–0999
G.R. Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Theoretical Modeling Department, IBM Hast Fishkill Laboratory, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533–0999
Get access

Abstract

In our earlier work [1] we had reported first theoretical observations of the spontaneous formation of 60° and 90° misfit dislocations in Au/Ni (15.9% mismatch) systems for the (111) and (001) interfaces respectively. Here, we present the analysis of the evolution of the dislocation configuration as it evolves from a highly strained coherent Au film. The driving force for the formation of these misfit dislocations was the reduction in the config-urational energy during the iterative relaxation of the atoms. A finely stepped energy minimization technique was developed to relax the high energy configuration. Misfit dislocations were also obtained for low misfit systems (Pd/Ni - 10% and Pd/Cu - 7.76%), but a modified approach, which is described here, was used for these systems which shows an energy barrier to the formation of dislocations in the low misfit systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nandedkar, A.S., Srinivasan, G.R., and Murthy, C.S., Phys. Rev. B, in press.Google Scholar
2.Various references in ‘Dislocations and Interfaces in Semiconductors’, Eds. Rajan, K., Narayan, J. and Ast, D., The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, Pa, 1988 Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
3. Dodson, B., Phys. Rev., B30, 3545 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Grabow, M. H. and Gilmer, G. H., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc, 94, 15 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Giimore, C.M., Phys. Rev. B, 40, 6402 (1989);Google Scholar
Gilmorc, C.M., Eridon, J.M., Provenzano, V., and Sprague, J.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 122, 373 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Dregia, S.A., Wynblatt, P., and Bauer, C.L., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc., 141, 399 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Nandedkar, A.S. and Narayan, J., Phil. Mag., A56, 625 (1987); ibid., A61, 873 (1990); Mat. Sci. and Eng., A 113, 51 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Van Der Merwe, J.H., J. Appl. Phys., 34, 117 (1963); ibid., Appl. Phys., 34, 123 (1963).Google Scholar
9. Chidambarrao, D., Srinivasan, G.R., Cunningham, B., and Murthy, C.S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 1001 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Halicioglu, T. and Pound, G.M., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 30, 619 (1975).Google Scholar