Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:24:54.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of Reliability of cap layers used in Cu-Black DiamondTM Interconnects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ahila Krishnamoorthy
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Process Technologies – Advanced Interconnect, Institute of Microelectronics, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore 117687
N.Y. Huang
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Process Technologies – Advanced Interconnect, Institute of Microelectronics, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore 117687
Shu-Yunn Chong
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Process Technologies – Advanced Interconnect, Institute of Microelectronics, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore 117687
Get access

Abstract

Black DiamondTM. (BD) is one of the primary candidates for use in copper-low k integration. Although BD is SiO2 based, it is vastly different from oxide in terms of dielectric strength and reliability. One of the main reliability concerns is the drift of copper ions under electric field to the surrounding dielectric layer and this is evaluated by voltage ramp (V-ramp) and time dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB). Metal 1 and Metal 2 intralevel comb structures with different metal widths and spaces were chosen for dielectric breakdown studies. Breakdown field of individual test structures were obtained from V-ramp tests in the temperature range of 30 to 150°C. TDDB was performed in the field range 0.5 – 2 MV/cm. From the leakage between combs at the same level (either metal 1 or metal 2) Cu drift through SiC/BD or SiN/BD interface was characterized. It was found that Cu/barrier and barrier/low k interfaces functioned as easy paths for copper drift thereby shorting the lines. Cu/SiC was found to provide a better interface than Cu/SiN.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Loboda, M.J., Microelectronic Engineering, 50, 15 (2000)Google Scholar
2. Lee, S.G., Kim, Y.J., Lee, S.P., Oh, H.S., Lee, S.J., Kim, M., Kim, I.G., Kim, J.H., Shin, H.J., Hong, J.G., Lee, H.D. and Kang, H.K., Jpn. J.Appl. Phys., 40, 2663, (2001).Google Scholar
3. Pai, P.L., Ting, Ch.H., in Copper as the Future Interconnection Material, Proc. VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conf., (IEEE, 1989) pp.258264.Google Scholar
4. Fang, K.L., Tsui, B.Y., Yang, C.C. and Lee, S.D., IITC IEEE proceedings 2001, p 250–52Google Scholar
5. Takeda, K., Hinode, K., Oodake, I., Oohashi, N. and Yamaguchi, H., Proc. Intl. Reliablity Symp., Reno, NV, 1998, pp. 3641.Google Scholar
6. Adema, G.M., Hwang, L.T., Rinne, A. and Turlik, I., IEEE Trans. Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology, 16, 53, (1993).Google Scholar
7. Chiang, C.C., and Chen, M.C., Proc. International Interconnect Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, p. 200202.Google Scholar
8. Yiang, K.Y., Guo, Q., Yoo, W.J., and Krishnamoorthy, A., to be presented at International Conference on Materials for Advanced Technologies (ICMAT) Symposium L, 29th June to 4th July, Singapore.Google Scholar