Skip to main content Accessibility help

Approaches to Long-Term Performance Assessment of Deep Underground Disposal of Radioactive Wastes: A European Perspective

  • Trevor J. Sumerling (a1) and David Read (a2)


The aim of long-term performance assessment (PA) is generally to develop confidence that the disposal system will perform within certain bounds and give rise to acceptably low impacts or risks. The PA procedure must be able to deal with:

  • - uncertainty due to incomplete understanding of the relevant processes;
  • - uncertainty due to limited sampling of the structures and characteristics of the system and especially the geological media;
  • - uncertainty about future conditions and processes leading to changes in the engineered barriers and natural environment that may affect radionuclide release, transport and exposure pathways.

A number of approaches have been taken to solving the problem of how to deal with such uncertainties. The differences in approach may be due to the stage of project development, differences in national regulatory guidance and the different r6les of the implementor and the regulator. This paper examines the rôles of the implementor and regulator and discusses possible approaches appropriate to both points of view.



Hide All
1. NEA, Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Can Long-term Safety be Evaluated? A Collective Opinion of the Radioactive Waste Management Committee OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee International Atomic Energy Agency, endorsed by the Experts for the Community Plan of Action in the Field of Radioactive Waste Management Commission of the European Communities, published NEA(OECD) Paris, 1991.
2. McCombie, C., The Role of the Repository Implementer in Providing and Demonstrating Safe Disposal of Radioactive Wastes, in High Level Radioactive Waste Management Proc. of the 3rd Ann. Conf., Las Vegas, 1992, Vol.2, pp. 102105.
3. NEA, Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories: Systematic Approaches to Scenario Development. Report of the NEA Working Group on the Identification and Selection of Scenarios for Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal, NEA (OECD) Paris, 1992.
4. Cadelli, N. et al. , PAGIS: Performance Assessment of Geological Isolation Systems for Radioactive Waste CEC Nuclear Science and Technology series, CEC EUR 11775 EN, 1988.
5. Thompson, B.G.J., The Time Dimension in Risk Analysis: Examples from Recent Work in the United Kingdom. In Saltelli A. et al (eds.), Risk Analysis in Nuclear Waste Management. 1989, pp. 231262.
6. Boulton, G.S., Time-dependent Modelling of Environmental Change, pp 363376; and Ringrose, P.S., et al. , Probabilistic Simulation of the Long-Term Evolution of Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites, pp.427-436, In Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories Proc. NEA/IAEA/CEC Symposium, Paris, 1990, NEA(OECD) Paris, 1991.
7. Umeki, H. et al. , Site-Generic Approach for Performance Assessment for HLW Disposal in Japan. In High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Proc. of the 2nd Ann. Conf., Las Vegas, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 17151732.
8. Sumerling, T.J. and Thompson, B.G.J., Application of a Probabilistic System-based Methodology for the Performance Assessment of Deep Underground Disposal of Nuclear Wastes, in High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Proc. of the 3rd Ann. Conf., Las Vegas, 1992, Vol.2, pp. 16471657.
9. Sumerling, T.J., (Editor), Dry Run 3: A Trial Assessment of Underground Disposal of Radioactive Wastes. Based on Probabilistic Risk Assessment. UK DoE Report DoE/HMIP/RR/92.039, 1992.
10. Thorne, M.C., Dry Run 3: Volume 8: Uncertainty and Bias Audit. UK DoE Report DoE/HMIP/RR/92.040, 1992.
11. McCombie, C., McKinley, I.G. and Zuidema, P., Sufficient Validation: The Value of Robustness in Performance Assessment and System Design. In GEOVAL-1990. Symposium on Validation of Geosphere Flow and Transport Models, OECD Paris 1991, pp. 598610.
12. NAGRA, Project GewAhr 1985: Nuclear Waste Management in Switzerland: Feasibility Studies and Safety Analyses. Vol. 1–, Vol. 9 (English Summary), Nagra Gewdihr Report Series, NGB 85–01/09, June 1985.
13. McKinley, I.G., Smith, P.A. and Curti, E., Can the Kristallin I Near-field Model be Considered Robust ?, in High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Proc. of the 3rd Ann. Conf., Las Vegas, 1992, Vol.2, pp. 17701776.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed