Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T13:04:04.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Density Functional Theory to Al Distribution in Mordenite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

G Fitzgerald ,
C. G. Coe ,
H.C. Klotz  and
J.E. Macdougall
G Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Cray Research, Inc. 655-E, Lone Oak Drive, Eagan, MN 55121
C. G. Coe
Affiliation:
Air Products and Chemicals, 7201 Hamilton Boulevard, Allentown, PA 18195
H.C. Klotz
Affiliation:
Air Products and Chemicals, 7201 Hamilton Boulevard, Allentown, PA 18195
J.E. Macdougall
Affiliation:
Air Products and Chemicals, 7201 Hamilton Boulevard, Allentown, PA 18195
Get access

Abstract

Mordenite zeolites are well known for their acid cracking abilities, but are often hindered by coke formation which limits their life. The dealumination and generation of Bronsted acid sites in the MOR structure will have significant implications as to their catalytic activity. Density functional theory (DFT) has been applied to determine preferred aluminum siting in the Na-mordenite zeolite structure. DFT correctly reproduces the 6-31G* Hartree-Fock predictions for the relative stabilities of the four T sites of mordenite in a T(OH)4 cluster. Larger cluster sizes influence the preferred Al siting with DFT predicting T2 as the preferred tetrahedral site. Since DFT computational requirements are considerably smaller than Hartree-Fock theory, it is an attractive alternative for studying zeolites. The calculations performed were based on fixed geometries obtained from crystallographic data. Further work employing local geometry optimization in the vicinity of the substituted Al is underway.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 291: Symposium O – Materials Theory and Modeling , 1992 , 239
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jackson, R.A.; Catlow, C.R., Molecular Simulation 1, 207 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Sauer, J.; Chem. Rev. 89, 199 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Deroune, E.G., Andre, J.M., Lemberte, L., Galet, P., Vanderveken, D., Vercauteren, D.P., Fripiat, J.G. in Theoretical Aspects of Hetergeneous Catalysis, edited by Moffat, J. (Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1990) p. 1.Google Scholar
4. Beran, S.; in Catalysis on Zeolites, Ed. Kallo, D. and Minachev, K.H., (Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1988) p. 1.Google Scholar
5. Lonsinger, S.R., Chakroborty, A.K., Theodorou, D.N., Bell, A.T., Catalysis Lett, in press, 1991.Google Scholar
6. June, R.L., Bell, A.T., Theodorou, D. N., J. Phys Chem. 94, 8232 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Pickett, S.D.; Nowak, A.K., Thomas, J.M. Peterson, B.K., Swift, , J.F.P., Cheetham, A.K., den Quden, C.J.J., Smit, B., Post, M.F.M., J. Phys. Chem. 94, 1233 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Deroune, E.G.; and Fripiat, J.G., In Proceedings of the Sixth International Zeolite Conference, edited by Olson, D. and Bisio, A. (Butterworths, U.K., 1984) pp. 717.Google Scholar
9. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.S., Phys. Rev. A 140, 1133 (1965).Google Scholar
10. Becke, A.D., Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Perdew, J.P., Phys. Rev B 33, 8822 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Andzelm, J.; Wimmer, E., J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1280 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Meier, W.M.; Zeitscrift für Kristallographie 115, 439 (1961).Google Scholar
14. Schlenker, J.L.; Pluth, J. J.; Smith, J.V.; Mat. Res. Bull. 14, 751 (1979).Google Scholar
15. Bodart, P.; Nagy, J.B.; Debras, G.; Gabelica, Z.; Jacobs, P.A., J. Phys. Chem. 90, 5183 (1086).Google Scholar
16. Itabash, K.; Okada, T.; Iagawa, K. in New Developements in Zeolite Science and Technology, edited by Murakami, Y., Iijima, A., Ward, J.W. (Kodansha, Tokyo, 1986) p. 369.Google Scholar