Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:24:21.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of Densification Process of Carbon/Carbon Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Seh-Min Oh
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, Organic Materials Division, PO Box 135, Pohang, Korea
Yang-Duk Park
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, Organic Materials Division, PO Box 135, Pohang, Korea
Get access

Abstract

An analytical method was developed to calculate efficiency of densifying carbon/carbon (C/C) composite with pitch for each cycle. Three factors were defined in the densificationprocess: an impregnation efficiency, w, a retention efficiency, x, and an overall densification efficiency, E. The relationships developed were applied to the results for three cycles of densification of C/C composite to evaluate the factors which depend on the route of impregnation and carbonization. The impregnation efficiency increases as the process is repeated due to a decrease of porosity, and the retention efficiency shows a tendency to be in a reverse proportion to the impregnation efficiency. The overall densification efficiency depends on the carbonization yield of pitch impregnant. The carbonization route P+A+G is the most effective method in densifying C/C composites, in which pressure carbonization(P) increases the carbonization yield and the retention efficiency of pitch, and graphitization(G) increases the impregnation efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fitzer, E., Hüttner, W., and Manocha, L.M., Carbon 18, 291 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Weisshaus, H., Kenig, S., Kastner, E., and Siegmann, A., Carbon 28, 125 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Weisshaus, H., Kenig, S., and Siegmann, A., Carbon 29, 1203 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Fitzer, E., Kompalik, D., and Yudate, K., Fuel 66, 1504 (1987).Google Scholar