Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:40:58.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adhesion and Tribological Properties of Ag and Ag/Ti Films on Zro2 Ceramic Substrates After Heat Treatment at 250°C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. H. Hsieh
Affiliation:
Materials and Components Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
O. O. Ajayi
Affiliation:
Materials and Components Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
A. Erdemir
Affiliation:
Materials and Components Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
F. A. Nichols
Affiliation:
Materials and Components Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
Get access

Abstract

Ag and Ag/Ti films were deposited on ZrO2 substrates by ion-beam-assisted deposition. Adhesion of these films was measured before and after heat treatment at 250°C in air. The results show that a graded interface between Ag and Ti was necessary for the Ag films to survive the heat treatment. Reciprocating pin-on-disc tests were performed at 150°C after heat treatment to investigate the relationship between adhesion and tribological properties. The failure of Ag and Ag/Ti (without graded interface) films was also observed during wear tests. However, this Ag film failure did not result in negative effects. All three Ag-coated substrates show better tribological behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Butler, E. P., Mater. Sci. Technol., 1, 417 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dufrane, K. F., Glaeser, W. A., in Proc. Int. Conf. on Wear of Mater., edited by Ludema, K. C., (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1987), pp. 285–191.Google Scholar
3. Erdemir, A., Bush, D. E., Erek, R. A., Fenske, G. R. and Lee, R., Lubr. Eng., 47, 863 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Erdemir, A., Fenske, G. R., Erek, R. A. and Cheng, C. C., Lubr. Eng., 46, 23 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Erek, R. A., and Fenske, G. R., in Beam-solid Interactions: Physical Phenomena. edited by Knapp, J. A., Borgesen, P., and Zuhr, R. A., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 157, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), pp. 8590.Google Scholar
6. Erdemir, A., Nichols, F. A., Fenske, G. R., and Hsieh, J. H., MRS Bulletin, Oct., 41 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Erdemir, A., Fenske, G. R., Nichols, F. A., Erek, R. A., STLE Trib. Trans, 33., 511 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Sood, D. K. and Baglin, J. E. E., Nucl. Inst. Method, B19/20. 954, (1987).Google Scholar
9. Martin, P. J., Sainty, W. G., and Netterfield, R. P., Appl. Optics, 21, 2668 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Kikuchi, A., Baba, S., and Kinbara, A., Thin Solid Films, 124. 343 (1985).Google Scholar