Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:51:14.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ac Susceptibility Studies of New and Familiar Magnetic Molecular Solids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Roger D. Sommer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309yeeg@colorado.edu
Brenda J. Korte
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309yeeg@colorado.edu
Scott P. Sellers
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309yeeg@colorado.edu
Gordon T. Yee
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309yeeg@colorado.edu
Get access

Abstract

ac Susceptometry has been used to study a number of magnetic molecular solids including a new compound, Mn(II) octaethyltetraazaporphyrin, α-MnOETAP, and decamethylmanganocenium tetracyanoethenide, Mn(Cp*)2•TCNE, a previously reported molecule-based ferromagnet. Both of these compounds exhibit signatures of ferromagnetism including significant hysteresis below 2 K and rapidly increasing χT (where χ is the molar susceptibility) with decreasing temperature. However, their ac susceptibility data show relatively strong dependence of χ′ and χ″ on the frequency of the applied field, indicating a spinglass state. Other molecular ferromagnetic solids examined show much less sensitivity. These studies indicate that the standard practice of characterization by dc and ac susceptometry at a single frequency are clearly insufficient for identifying the magnetic state of a molecular solid.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sellers, S. P., Korte, B. J., Fitzgerald, J. P., Reiff, W. M. and Yee, G. T., submitted to J. Am. Chem. Soc.Google Scholar
2. Robertson, J. M., J. Chem. Soc. 615 (1935) and 219 (1937)Google Scholar
b) Figgis, B. N., Mason, R., and Williams, G. A., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B B36, 2963 (1980)Google Scholar
c) Barraclough, C. G., Martin, R. L. and Mitra, S., J. Chem. Phys. 53 16381642 (1970)Google Scholar
d) Mitra, S., Gregson, A. K., Hatfield, W. E. and Weller, R. R., Inorg. Chem. 22, 17291732 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Yee, G. T., Manriquez, J. M., Dixon, D. A., McLean, R. S., Groski, D. M., Flippen, R. B., Narayan, K. S., Epstein, A. J. and Miller, J. S., Adv. Mater. 3, 309311 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Palacio, F., Lazaro, F. J. and van Duyneveldt, A. J., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 176, 289306 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Wynn, C. M., Albrecht, A. S., Landee, C. P., Navas, C. and Turnbull, M. M., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 274, 110 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Quantum Design Application Note #1, Sample Mounting.Google Scholar
7. Mydosh, J. A., Spin Glasses, An Experimental Introduction (Taylor and Francis, London, 1993).Google Scholar
8. Wynn, C. M., Girtu, M. A., Brinckerhoff, W. B., Suguira, K.-I., Miller, J. S. and Epstein, A. J., Chem. Mater. 9, 21562163 (1997).Google Scholar
9. McLean, R. S., private communication. A Faraday balance was used to obtain these data. A large applied field improves signal to noise with this technique.Google Scholar