Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T23:14:28.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

N-type Microcrystalline Silicon Oxide (μc-SiOx:H) Window Layers with Combined Anti-reflection Effects for n-i-p Thin Film Silicon Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Vladimir Smirnov
Affiliation:
v.smirnov@fz-juelich.de, Forschungszentrum Juelich, IEF5 Photovoltaik, Juelich, Germany
Wanjiao Boettler
Affiliation:
w.boettler@fz-juelich.de, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
Andreas Lambertz
Affiliation:
a.lambertz@fz-juelich.de, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
Oleksandr Astakhov
Affiliation:
o.astakhov@fz-juelich.de, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
Reinhard Carius
Affiliation:
r.carius@fz-juelich.de, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
Friedhelm Finger
Affiliation:
f.finger@fz-juelich.de, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
Get access

Abstract

We will describe the development and application of n-type microcrystalline silicon oxide (μc-SiOx:H) alloys as window layers in thin film silicon solar cells with microcrystalline silicon (μc-Si:H) absorber layers. Cells are prepared in n–i–p deposition sequence with illumination through the n-side. The layers were deposited by radio-frequency plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition (RF-PECVD) at 185°C substrate temperature, using a mixture of phosphine (PH3), silane (SiH4), carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen (H2) gases, at CO2 flows varied between 0.5 and 2 sccm and different thickness. Films were characterised by dark conductivity measurements, Photothermal Deflection Spectroscopy (PDS) and Raman spectroscopy to evaluate optical band gap E04, refractive index n and crystallinity ICRS, respectively. The results were compared with the data of alternative optimised window layers, such as n-type μc-Si:H and silicon carbide (μc-SiC:H) films. Also solar cells with conventional illumination through the p-side window were investigated for comparison. Solar cells were prepared with μc-SiOx:H n-layers of varied compositions and characterised by current-voltage (J-V) measurements under AM 1.5 illumination (and also under modified AM 1.5 illumination with red (OG590) and blue (OG7) filters) and reflectance measurements. The effects of the μc-SiOx n-layer composition and thickness on the performance of n-i-p cells were investigated and correlated with the optical, electrical and structural properties of the μc-SiOx:H n-layers. The results indicate that n-type μc-SiOx:H provides a sufficient combination of conductivity (up to 0.1 S/cm) and crystallinity (ICRS up to 30%) to function well as a doped layer for the internal electric field and the carrier transport and as a nucleation layer for the growth of the μc-Si:H i-layer. As a window layer, it also results in an enhanced spectral response, particularly in the long wavelength part of the spectrum of the solar cells, in comparison with the cells containing alternative window layers. An improved short circuit current density (Jsc) can be attributed to the wide optical gap E04 (around 2.3 eV) in the μc-SiOx:H window layers and reduced reflection in the long wavelength region of the spectrum. A minimum total reflectance of only 6% at 570nm wavelength was achieved with such μc-SiOx:H window layers. Using optimised n-type μc-SiOx:H as a window layer, an efficiency of 8.0% for 1cm2 cell area was achieved with 1 μm thick μc-Si:H absorber layer and Ag back reflector.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ichikawa, Y., Tabuchi, K., Takano, A., Fujikake, S., Yoshida, T., Sakai, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 198–200, 1081 (1996).Google Scholar
2 Jana, T., Ray, S., Thin Solid Films, 376, 241 (2000).Google Scholar
3 Matsumoto, Y., V. Sanchez R., A. Avila G., Thin Solid Films, 516, 593 (2008).Google Scholar
4 Janotta, A., Janssen, R., Schmidt, M., Graf, T., Stutzmann, M., Gögens, L., Bergmaier, A., Dollinger, G., Hammerl, C., Schreiber, S., Stritzker, B., Phys. Rev. B 69, 115206 (2004).Google Scholar
5 Das, D., Jana, M., Barua, A. K., Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. Cells 63, 285 (2000).Google Scholar
6 Buehlmann, P., Bailat, J., Domine, D., Billet, A., Meillaud, F., Feltrin, A., Ballif, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 143505 (2007).Google Scholar
7 Lambertz, A., Dasgupta, A., Reetz, W., Gordijn, A., Carius, R., Finger, F., in: Proc. 22nd EUPVSEC, Milan, Italy (2007) p. 1839.Google Scholar
8 Das, C., Lambertz, A., Hüpkes, J., Reetz, W., Finger, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 053509 (2008).Google Scholar
9 Domine, D., Buehlmann, P., Bailat, J., Billet, A., Feltrin, A., Ballif, C., Phys. Stat. Sol. (RRL) 2 (4), 163 (2008).Google Scholar
10 Dylla, T., Finger, F., Schiff, E. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 32103 (2005).Google Scholar
11 Dylla, T., Reynolds, S., Carius, R., Finger, F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 1093 (2006).Google Scholar
12 Huang, Y., Dasgupta, A., Gordign, A., Finger, F., Carius, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 203502 (2007).Google Scholar
13 Smirnov, V., Böttler, W., Lambertz, A., Wang, H., Carius, R., and Finger, F., Phys. Stat. Sol. (C) 7, 1053 (2010).Google Scholar
14 Kluth, O., Schoepe, G., Huepkes, J., Agashe, C., Mueller, J., and Rech, B., Thin Solid Films 442, 80 (2003).Google Scholar
15 Houben, L., Luysberg, M., Hapke, P., Carius, R., Finger, F. and Wagner, H., Philos. Mag. A 77, 1447 (1998).Google Scholar
16 Bouhafs, D., Moussi, A., Chikouche, A., Ruiz, J., Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. Cells 52, 79 (1998).Google Scholar
17 Xiao, L., Astakhov, O., Carius, R., Lambertz, A., and Finger, F., Phys. Stat. Sol. (C) 7, 941 (2010).Google Scholar