Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:44:21.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Electron Beam Polishing Technique for Heteroepitaxial Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. P. Tobin
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, MA
A. C. Greenwald
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, MA
R. G. Wolfson
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, MA
T. T. Wong
Affiliation:
New England Research Center, Inc., Sudbury, MA
Get access

Abstract

We have developed a novel technique for improving the morphology of as-grown monocrystalline thin films on foreign substrates. A pulsed electron beam briefly heats the surface of the film above its melting temperature, allowing surface tension in the liquid to erase irregular features. Crystallinity of the layer is preserved by rapid resolidification with the underlying material acting as a seed. Pulse polishing has been applied to two heteroepitaxial systems exhibiting rough as-deposited surfaces: germanium on silicon and cadmium telluride on mica. In both cases the surface morphology was dramatically improved while crystallinity and other critical properties of the layers were maintained. We believe this technique has potentially wide application to many thin film systems and should allow a greater degree of freedom in the growth conditions for heteroepitaxial thin films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yaron, G., Hess, L. D. and Kokorowski, S. A., IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev. ED–27, 964 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Affolter, K., Luthy, W. and Wittmer, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 559 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Maracas, G. N., Harris, G. L., Lee, C. A. and McFarlane, R. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 453 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cullis, A. G., Webber, H. C., and Chew, N. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 547 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Anthony, T. R. and Cline, H. E., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 3888 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Bhattacharyya, A., Streetman, B. G., and Hess, K., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 3611 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Godfrey, D. J., Hill, A. C. and Hill, C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 128, 1798 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Greenwald, A. C., Kirkpatrick, A. R., Little, R. G. and Minnucci, J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 783 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Nowak, Z. et al. , Thin Solid Films 52, 405 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Tufte, O. N. and Stelzer, E. L., J. Appl. Phys. 40, 4559 (1969).Google Scholar
11. Yezhovsky, Yu. K. and Kalinkin, I. P., Thin Solid Films 18, 127 (1973).Google Scholar